Plenary

The next set of questions are those to the Minister for Rural Affairs and North Wales, and the first question comes from Samuel Kurtz.

I have regular discussions with the Minister for Climate Change, and we are working across portfolios to develop the joint fisheries statement to set out policies for sustainable fisheries management to deliver the fisheries objectives. This will include our commitment to the delivery of an ecosystem-based approach to fisheries management.

Thank you, Minister. You will be delighted to hear, I’m sure, that I’ve been recently appointed the Atlantic grey seal champion, and last week I enjoyed a meeting with the Marine Conservation Society on Tenby north beach to discuss some of the challenges that these creatures face from human actions while undertaking a beach clean. At this time of year the Pembrokeshire and Carmarthenshire coastline sees many new-born seal pups venturing forth for the first time into the wild Atlantic ocean, but, sadly, one of the main threats to these amazing creatures is the pollution created by marine traffic. With the responsibility for protecting our marine wildlife falling under your colleague the Minister for Climate Change, and the responsibility for fisheries within your own portfolio, can you detail what action you and your ministerial colleague are taking to ensure that the future of these welcome visitors to our coastline are safeguarded for generations to come?

Well done on being appointed the Atlantic grey seal champion. You should have a little competition with your colleague Darren Millar how many times you can say what you're champion for in the Chamber. [Laughter.] I think it's been very lovely to see how many seal pups we have seen around our coast over the summer. Going back to your specific question about the conversations that the Minister for Climate Change and I have around our policies, it is really important that we make sure that, for instance, all our designated features within our marine protected areas are assessed against any potential harms from activities such as those you referred to.

Protection of the marine environment is something that I've been championing for many, many years, and one particular issue that I've raised in the Chamber on a number of occasions is the reintroduction of scallop dredging in a small area of Cardigan bay, a special area of conservation, and the impact on marine life in that area. Minister, it's been several years now since this activity was restarted, and I'm keen to know what assessment has been carried out with regard to the environmental impact of scallop dredging on this site since it was reintroduced in 2016.

Thank you, and I can reassure Joyce Watson that dredge fishing for scallops is highly regulated in Welsh waters, and that includes through spatial restrictions as well. We closely monitor the activity. We take enforcement action wherever necessary, and this is principally done by tracking vessels using the vessel monitoring systems that we have on our fisheries patrol vessels, which include the Rhodri Morgan, for instance, and also through port and harbour-based inspections by our marine enforcement officers. And each year before the scallop fishery reopens, the Welsh Government conducts a comprehensive habitats regulatory assessment, and that is only done with further agreement from Natural Resources Wales.

Could I first of all, just as the salmon champion of the Senedd, ask the seals to play gently? [Laughter.] But I have a particular interest, as the Minister knows, in the partnership working that underpins both fisheries and marine management, the exploitation, sustainably, of our natural resources, alongside the ecosystem approach, which she rightly said would form the basis of Welsh Government thinking. So, I wonder whether she is taking the time to look at the effective working of both the national and the local groups—the Wales marine action and advisory group, but also those that underpin it on a local basis—to make sure that we've got that balance right, that all voices are being heard, and that there's an effective partnership. It's been quite a few years now since they've been put in place, so it seems that it's an appropriate time to say, 'Are they working effectively, are they getting the balance right for nature and also for sustainable exploitation?'

Thank you. I haven't had any discussions, certainly with this part of the portfolio; I would imagine the Minister for Climate Change, that would now fall within her remit. But I think it is really important that we work with the groups, such as you suggest, because if we're going to get good environmental status, for instance, for our waters, which we are trying to achieve at the moment, we really need to listen to what these people are telling us and what work is being carried out. But I will ask the Minister for Climate Change to update you.

The Welsh Government is progressing a foundational economy policy, of which food is an integral part. Cabinet colleagues and I regularly discuss linkages between our portfolios and the wider procurement of local produce. Local authorities and schools are responsible for purchasing food for school meals and procuring from agreed suppliers.

Thank you, Minister. In the interests of lowering carbon emissions, procuring local produce for school meals would help towards the Welsh Government's targets and obviously help tackle climate change. I'd be grateful if you could outline how the Welsh Government is working with local authorities to understand, monitor, measure, assess how much local produce is being used in school meals and where it comes from.

Thank you. We obviously recognise the very clear benefits of procuring local produce in terms of issues, and that includes food miles, which, obviously, would play into the significant part of your question. I also think if you use local produce, it helps children and young people really connect with their local environment too. There are a couple of local authorities that are working very hard in this area. I know Caerphilly County Borough Council and I think Carmarthenshire County Council are currently looking at the way we procure food, and, obviously, the monitoring of the carbon emissions would be part of that work going forward. Sorry, it was Monmouthshire, as well, that are really working hard in this area. But, again, this wouldn't really sit within my portfolio, but I will ensure that if there is any further information that the Minister responds.

Questions from the party spokespeople.

Sorry about that pause. I was on the wrong part of my script.

Questions from the party spokespeople. Conservative spokesperson first of all, Darren Millar.

Diolch, Llywydd. In your capacity as Minister for north Wales, what action are you taking to unlock the moratorium on capital investment in roads in the region?

So, you will be aware that the Deputy Minister for Climate Change has brought forward a road review. That has not yet reported, but, obviously, once that reports, we can see what schemes will continue to proceed and we can look at the funding issues then.

Thank you for that answer, Minister, but many people in north Wales will not consider it to be good enough. The Labour Party made pre-election promises that it would deliver significant improvements to the trunk road network in north Wales. You said that you would deliver a Menai crossing—a third Menai crossing—but it's been put on hold. You said that you would remove roundabouts in Llanfairfechan and Penmaenmawr on the A55, and those projects have been put on hold. And you also said that you'd deliver on the promise to address congestion around Deeside, but that's been put on hold. So, these are big projects, which you've promised to deliver for the people of north Wales, which are now in the deep freeze as a result of the decisions being taken by this Government. People in north Wales would expect that, as the Minister for north Wales, you would be shouting out to unlock those projects and ensure their delivery. But isn't it the truth, I'm afraid to say, that this Labour Government simply doesn't care about north Wales, and that's why other projects are proceeding while these are on ice?

Well, Darren Millar knows that that is absolutely not true. I'm a Member from north-east Wales and I would never allow that to happen. The fact that we have a Minister for north Wales and we have had for a significant number of years, with a Cabinet sub-committee for north Wales, absolutely shows that, so please don't mislead in that way. You say that they're in the deep freeze; they're not in the deep freeze. There is currently a review going on. As you say, there were manifesto commitments made. This is a five-year Government, we're five months into it, so I don't think you can say that these things will not happen. There is a review process going on, and once the review process has reported and we see what goes on, then perhaps you can start shouting.

But given that they are manifesto commitment, and you've just suggested they'll be delivered within the five years of the Labour Government's term, why on earth would you put them in the deep freeze in the first place? The reality is that they should be progressing, because you've given a clear commitment. I accept what you say in terms of your care for north-east Wales: that is a place that you have ably represented for many years. But I'm afraid that the voice of north Wales around that Cabinet table doesn't appear to actually carry a great deal of clout, because if you look at the record of this Government on north Wales, our health service, the worst A&E performance of all of the health boards is the one that serves the north-Wales region. We've got the longest waiting times of the whole of Wales—in fact, amongst the worst in the whole of the United Kingdom. We know that local authorities, on average, in north Wales get worse settlements than other parts of the country, and we know that the road projects that have been put on ice in north Wales have been frozen while projects are still proceeding in south Wales and in other parts of the country. Doesn't that evidence clearly show that this is a Government that doesn't actually prioritise north Wales, that that's always the second on its list of priorities, and that it's actually time that this Government levelled up across the whole of Wales in order that we can have some fairness for our region in the north?

Well, there could be a short answer, and the short answer is 'no', but I will give you the benefit of the doubt and try and engage in a much more positive way with you. You are cherry-picking. So, you referred to local authorities, for instance. You know how local authorities are funded—you know that. It's a formula. We've just heard the Minister for Finance and Local Government explain to Members who, perhaps, weren't aware of the way local authorities are funded. It's a formula. It's a formula that's done—

That is unfair to north Wales.

It's a formula that is done with the Welsh Government and local authorities, and until local authorities request—. And I've been local government Minister and I was never met with a request to have a look at the formula, because they know, if you've got—[Interruption.] If you've got a list of 22 local authorities, somebody's going to be at the top and somebody's going to be at the bottom, and whatever formula you use, that will happen. That will happen. So, it's okay cherry-picking all these things.

Now, just to go back to the road review, which is the question you asked me in the beginning. You talk about 'putting on ice'. Now, I accept, at the moment, there is a road review, so these things have been put on ice—not in the deep freeze; they've been put on ice. And once that road review is published with the recommendations—[Interruption.] I know you've never been in Government here. A manifesto commitment covers five years; a programme for government covers five years. We are five months into that programme for government; there is plenty of time to continue to deliver for north Wales.

Plaid Cymru spokesperson, Cefin Campbell.

Thank you very much, Llywydd. The Minister will be aware that this is Wool Week, and last year, my fellow Member Llyr Gruffydd raised concerns with you about the state of the wool market in Wales. As a result of the pandemic, the decline in the wool market meant that farmers were paying around £1 to shear a sheep and only getting 19p or 20p back for every roll of wool. Now, thank goodness, the prices have gone up slightly since then, but it is far from being sufficient. It is clear, therefore, that we need to think about alternative ways of using wool in order to assist the industry. And wool, as everyone knows, has long been used as a very effective insulator. In light of the increasing attention given to climate change and improving our environment, the benefits of this become increasingly important to house builders and home owners. So, are you willing to consider supporting the wool industry in Wales and using wool to insulate the homes that the Government intends to build, including the retrofitting programme? Thank you very much.

You make some very pertinent points around the price of wool. I'm trying to think—I think it was the end of the last term of Government where we saw the wool prices really drop and I had meetings with the British wool authority to try and see what we could do to help Wales. I made representations to the UK Government along with ministerial colleagues from Scotland.

Certainly, the Minister for Climate Change, who obviously has responsibility for housing and for retrofitting, I know has had discussions around this, because, as you say, wool is a very good insulator. So, if that's one way we can continue to help support Welsh wool, we will certainly be looking to do that. I'm not sure how far the Minister has got with her discussions, but I know she has had initial discussions around this.

Thank you very much. Scab is a very important issue, again in relation to sheep in terms of animal welfare, and it's an issue that hasn't had sufficient focus over recent years. It is an extensive and increasing problem, unfortunately. The Welsh Government announced that it was to allocate some £5 million to help eradicate sheep scab at the beginning of 2019. It was disappointing that, in November last year, it was announced that the £5 million would be diverted to support COVID programmes. The agricultural sector is very keen for the Welsh Government to restore this £5 million in an effort to eradicate sheep scab and to realise the commitment and promise you made to the industry. There is funding, as you know, in the rural development plan, and, in Plaid Cymru's view, the Government should allocate £5 million from that to help the industry to eradicate scab. So, will the Minister commit to adhere to her original pledge in order to tackle this important challenge?

I quite agree; sheep scab is a very complex and difficult disease. I don't think it's just down to the Welsh Government; I think it is down to the industry together. Certainly, we have been working together to do that. Unfortunately, because of decisions I had to take regarding the budget in relation to COVID, I wasn't able to put that funding forward, but certainly I am having discussions now about the next stage of the rural development plan, and I certainly can assure you and the industry that funding to assist in relation to eradication of sheep scab will be very high up in my priorities.

Thank you very much. And the final question: Members will be aware that last weekend was designated World Mental Health Day. Given their nature, rural communities can be very isolated, and as a result of the lack of opportunities for people to meet with others on a day-to-day basis, families can often suffer social isolation with mental health problems emerging from that. Unfortunately, 84 per cent of farmers under the age of 40 say that mental health issues are the biggest invisible challenge to farming in Wales. A report commissioned by the Prince's Countryside Fund has outlined how markets can secure a more healthy future for farmers and rural communities as places where people can meet and socialise. So, can the Minister outline what steps the Government is taking not only to help to support the mental health of farmers, but also to support the economic role that community centres such as markets play in providing social benefits, which are so important?

Thank you. I think that is the most important of your three questions, and it's something that I've always taken a very close and particular interest in since I've been in this portfolio. Because whilst the agricultural sector and farming communities are some of the most close-knit groups I've ever met, you can see that when you're on a farm you sometimes are a bit isolated. Particularly during the pandemic, I think that's certainly been highlighted. So, I've given significant funding to agriculture mental health charities.

You asked at the end around markets, for instance, and one of the things is the funding that we were able to allocate to the DPJ Foundation. I'm sure you're aware of that charity. They looked at how they could train other people to recognise symptoms of mental health issues in places like farmers markets, where perhaps you wouldn't think, if you were a farmer with concerns, that you could be signposted to the most appropriate place. So, that's an area we've worked on. Also, we launched FarmWell during the COVID-19 pandemic, which was like a one-stop shop, where, if you accessed that, you would know where you could then go on to get further assistance.

I meet quite regularly with all the agricultural charities, and they all, I think, every single one of them—there were about half a dozen I met with regularly over the past 18 months—said that during the pandemic the referrals to them had increased. So, it's something I keep a very close eye on, and, if there's anything further I can do to help, I will certainly be happy to do so.

Question 3 has been withdrawn. So, question 4, Siân Gwenllian.

Thank you. The Welsh Government monitors and, where necessary, enforces compliance with fisheries regulations through a range of assurance and inspection activities. These include patrols, surveillance and inspections onshore and at sea, and we also take appropriate and proportionate legal action.

A group of local fishermen has contacted me about alleged poaching that is taking place, and the lack of enforcement of fishing byelaws. The allegation is that there has been a significant decline in the enforcement teams of Natural Resources Wales, leaving only a team of 15 to do this work the length and breadth of Wales. The group of fishermen has said that this is insufficient to safeguard our fisheries, and reports that poachers are taking advantage of this, and are causing major damage to fish stocks and to the viability of the waterways for the future. What specific steps will you take to improve the situation?

We've certainly increased the number of marine enforcement officers that we as a Government have, and, in north Wales, it has increased also over the last couple of years. The number of onshore inspections has increased significantly. Just in this year alone, up until the middle of October, obviously, we've had 350 onshore inspections, and that compares to 310 in 2020. So, we are seeing far more inspection work. I'm very concerned to hear of the particular concern that you raised, and if you want to write to me, I will ask for that specifically to be done. But, as I say, the level of inspections has increased significantly, and, as we are bringing in new recruits, because we are continuing to recruit enforcement officers, I would hope to see activity much more closely monitored, and obviously enforcement put in there.

As the Minister will be aware, despite every effort to stop and prevent illegal fishing, some people are still determined to break the law and illegally overharvest our seas for their commercial gain. This, unfortunately, has a huge knock-on effect, with fish stocks being depleted, the livelihoods of law-abiding fishermen being affected, and the placement of endangered fish species into more perilous population decline. As many in this Chamber will know, Brexit has led to more than just heated words regarding the fishing of European countries in British territorial waters, and a current issue that is emerging is that fishing vessels are switching off their automatic identification systems and long-range identification tracking devices in order to fish in waters undetected. I have little doubt that Welsh waters are likely to be targeted by this behaviour, so could the Minister make a statement about what conversations they and their colleagues have had with the UK Government regarding this practice, and what measures are they able to take to prevent it?

This is something I've obviously discussed many times with the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Secretary of State and with the UK Government as a whole, certainly as we approached the EU transition period. Sometimes the UK Government's answer was, 'We'll send in the navy', which I don't think was the answer at all. But any illegal fishing is unacceptable.

What we did as a Government, because that was the second part of your question, was we ensured that we had new fishing patrol vessels, because, certainly when I came into portfolio five years ago, the vessels that we had at that time were not fit for purpose. So, you'll be aware we had new fishing enforcement vessels, which I think has certainly helped. But any illegal fishing is unacceptable. I meet with the DEFRA Minister and my counterparts in Scotland and Northern Ireland again, I think, at the end of this month, and certainly, fishing is always on the agenda.

Pollution of any kind impacts us all and we must tackle it for the benefit of our environment and communities. On 27 January this year, I introduced the Water Resources (Control of Agricultural Pollution) (Wales) Regulations 2021, and initial measures came into force on 1 April.

Can I thank the Minister for that response? Whilst last week the major public debate was about safety from COVID, my e-mail account had more contact regarding pollution of the River Wye than it did about anything else. I'm also aware of the pollution of other rivers from agricultural run-off. People are also concerned about run-off from chicken farms and nitrogen and other chemicals going into the river. Can we expect to see an improvement in river quality in the near future? Because from what I hear from people regarding the River Wye, it is in a very delicate state at the moment, and I'm sure other rivers will be in exactly the same position fairly soon. We need to protect our rivers, and whatever it takes to protect our rivers needs to be done.

I absolutely agree with the Member, and we do have concerns around the River Wye at the moment. You ask whether we'll see an improvement in our rivers. What I want to see is an improvement on the scale that we've seen with our bathing waters, for instance, where we've made huge improvement strides. I will certainly want to see that with the rivers. I am working closely with the Minister for Climate Change, because preventing pollution from poultry farming certainly has a role to play, as you referred to. And obviously, planning authorities are having to consider the environmental impacts of any planning proposals for new poultry units, so that's why I've been working with the Minister in relation to planning, because we have seen an increased number, certainly in the number of poultry farms and the applications as well. So, we need to make sure that the cumulative impact doesn't have a detrimental effect.

Thank you, Minister, for answering Mike's question; it's really helpful. The situation with some of our rivers across Wales is extremely worrying, and we share that worry. An urgent shared endeavour is needed to address the pollution levels currently being experienced. I'm sure you would agree, though, Minister, that river pollution isn't all due to agriculture, as we have seen in the River Usk, where regular discharges of raw sewage into the river are taking place, even when it seems there haven't been significant episodes of rain. Hundreds and hundreds of local people are really concerned about that. I know you will be as well, and I furnished you with evidence of that. Minister, would you agree that the majority of farmers care for the environment and do the right things? And would you finally agree that we need our regulators, NRW, to step up and deal with anyone or any body that breaches the rules, and that includes water companies? What we're seeing at the moment is totally unacceptable, certainly on the Usk.

I will certainly agree with both of your statements. I would never say that all pollution is caused by agricultural practices. There are many sources of pollution, and I would say the majority of farmers absolutely care for the environment. However, we are seeing unacceptable limits of agricultural pollution—and I referred to the regulations that came into force earlier this year.

In relation to your other point, around other sources of pollution, obviously, where water companies fail to comply with their permit conditions, or they operate without a permit—and you'll be aware that NRW issue permits for storm overflows, for instance—NRW will investigate and, where appropriate, will take enforcement action. So, you're absolutely right—it is important that our regulators play their part as well.

Good afternoon, Minister. Just following on from my colleague's question around the River Wye, living on the River Wye as I do, in Hay-on-Wye, I do get additional questions and issues brought up around this issue. It's a very live concern. The River Wye, like other rivers, runs through both England and Wales, so there is a complex issue here about how we work across borders. This week, The Times newspaper featured an admission, for the first time, from a big chicken supplier, Avara Foods, that the use of chicken farms contributes to the pollution in the Wye catchment area. And having met with organisations locally and nationally who are concerned about the pollution in the River Wye, including—very important to say this—representatives from farming unions, who themselves are very, very concerned and committed to tackling river pollution, I would like to ask you, Minister, how you intend, as my colleague has mentioned, to work to strengthen the abilities of Natural Resources Wales, and their active role with Natural England, in order to ensure that we tackle river pollution with the appropriate resources and budget to deliver a clear action plan. And I wonder if I could ask you to meet with me—and perhaps there may be others as well—to discuss strengthening Natural Resources Wales. Thank you. Diolch yn fawr iawn.

In relation to the last question, around meeting with you to discuss NRW, that actually falls within the portfolio of the Minister for Climate Change—she has responsibility for NRW. So, I would suggest you write to her to ask in relation to that specific part of your question.

In relation to the poultry farms and the pollution around the River Wye, as I said, preventing pollution from poultry farms has a massive role to play in the quality of our rivers. And it is important that the planning permission threshold, for instance, is correct. So, at the moment, the threshold is so that if you have—I forget what the figure is—this number of chickens, you don't have to apply for planning permission, which certainly concerns me. And that's part of the discussions I am having with the Minister for Climate Change, who, as you are aware, also has responsibility for planning. The regulations that we currently have, which are from 2016, require intensive poultry units to obtain a permit to operate, and that does include measures to protect the environment. If we need to strengthen those regulations, I think we need to look very hard at doing that, but, as I say, that's part of the discussions I have with the Minister for Climate Change.

Thank you. The Government’s response to the review was published on 4 March 2020. To address the recommendations, officials are working closely with local authorities on tackling barriers to enforcement, enhanced training, better guidance and improved use of resources within local authorities, as part of a three-year Welsh Government-funded project.

Can I thank the Minister for the answer, and actually welcome some of the recommendations that you mention and have been taken up by the Welsh Government? However, one of the recommendations not yet taken up was an accredited or graded system for dog breeders, which was described as a,

'system of assigning scores to breeding establishments based on existing licensing inspections'.

To me, this is a no-brainer. It would bring much-needed consumer confidence to those looking to purchase dogs and increase the reputation of those that follow the rules. It would ensure puppies are healthy and looked after before leaving for their new owners. So, with this in mind, what further consideration has the Welsh Government given to this recommendation to protect not only dogs but their breeders and customers too, by introducing a scoring system for breeding establishments?

Thank you. It is something I am currently considering as part of the animal welfare plan. So, I've asked officials—the chief veterinary officer and her officers—to look at a five-year animal welfare plan for Wales so that we can build on the progress that we've made on animal welfare, certainly over the past 16 or so years, and my plan is to introduce an animal welfare plan later this year that will look at what we should do for the next five years of this Government. This is certainly something I'm considering within that. I think there's a broad range of policies we need to bring forward, not just about dogs, but I think if we are going to maintain the momentum that we have, because I think we have very, very high animal welfare standards in Wales, we need to look at that momentum of reform, and the plan will absolutely do that.

Thank you. The Welsh Government work closely with the Animal Welfare Network for Wales group, who published their voluntary code of practice for animal welfare establishments or sanctuaries in 2020. Further consideration on better regulation of animal welfare establishments, which include sanctuaries, will be addressed via the programme for government commitments and the proposed animal welfare plan for Wales I just referred to.

Diolch, Minister. We have some incredible sanctuaries here in Wales doing vital work to rescue animals that have been abandoned or injured. The vast majority of sanctuaries and rescue centres are models of good practice. However, there is no regulation of them. Anyone can establish one, whether or not they have the experience and the know-how. It is the view of the RSPCA, one of the leading authorities on animal welfare, that sanctuary and rescue centre regulation is long overdue in Wales to show that animals have the protection that they need. The legislation would also ensure that established sanctuaries and rescue centres that are models of good practice will be protected and not tarnished by rogue establishments. Can you give an indication whether you're looking into this legislation and, if so, when it would be implemented?

Thank you. So, you're absolutely right—they play an invaluable part in animal welfare services, and, unfortunately, there are times when things have gone wrong, and certainly, since I've been Minister, I've had a couple of issues highlighted to me, but the majority of them, as you say, are models of good practice. I mentioned the code of practice in my answer to you, and I am aware that that group that worked with us on that do have a desire for the introduction of statutory measures. They would like statutory regulation or some sort of licensing system to come into place. It is, again, something I am considering within the animal welfare plan that I will be publishing later this year.

I'm sure all parties across the Chamber rightly support steps to ensure animal welfare standards are being met, and I'm always happy to declare an interest as the owner of a lovely two-year-old Glen of Imaal terrier. It's really important that we have the right animal welfare standards in place. I'd certainly echo the words mentioned in terms of the vital role that animal sanctuaries play in facilitating animals and giving them a safe environment to live in for a time. We do know, though, Minister, that a lot of the work in terms of ensuring the regulations are kept to are undertaken by local council officers, and as and when there's more regulation put in place, that puts more work on already stretched budgets within local authorities to support the enforcement of those regulations. So, Minister, what discussions are you having with local authorities to understand what those current budget pressures are to enforce existing regulations, and what discussions are you having with them to understand what those pressures might be in the future with further regulations as well?

I mentioned in my previous answer to Tom Giffard that the Welsh Government had funded a project with local authorities. It's a three-year project that we began as part of our work around bringing legislation forward in relation to banning third party sales of dogs and cats, which I brought in a few weeks ago. So, we have funded that project, working with local authorities, to see what the barriers were, because I think it doesn't always need legislation, does it? We certainly wanted to see what those barriers were, and funding was clearly a barrier, so we funded the project, which I think has now really helped local authority enforcement officers be able to keep up with the latest statutory guidance, for instance. They've had additional training and, I have to say, they've been a very good partner in bringing these guidelines forward.

Welsh farmers receive full market value for cattle removed under the TB eradication programme. I will be making an oral statement next month regarding a refreshed programme for TB eradication in Wales. Arrangements for making TB payments to farmers will feature in that statement.

Thank you. Two thousand, nine hundred and ninety cattle were slaughtered in the second quarter of this year, pushing the number of animals killed due to bovine TB to 6,175. Now, through me helping one of my constituents, where they are struggling with a bTB breakdown, you wrote to me advising, and I quote, that valuations do not have to be agreed by the farmer and the market value cannot be appealed. Welsh Government guidance notes on TB compensation state,

'The market value of an animal slaughtered for TB will be paid as compensation in most cases.'

What is unfair, though, is the cap on compensation being £5,000, because this particular farmer has some that are worth considerably more thousands than five. He shows them as well, you see. So, a pedigree bull could easily be worth well over £5,000. So, Minister, would you have a look again at the cap and extend that right to allow farmers to appeal, to challenge that value given to them? They're already devastated at the time of slaughter, but let's make sure that they get true and equal compensation. Diolch.

Thank you, and I am aware that you wrote to me last week again, I think about the same farmer. I will ensure you get a response by next week.

Animal owners are paid compensation, as you know, and it is really important that we strive to ensure that the payment policy is fair not just to the animal owner, or to the farmer in this instance, but also to the taxpayer, because obviously that is public money. And I know, it's inevitable, isn't it, there'll be occasions when the owner is not satisfied with the valuation given. But I have to say, complaints are rare. We do intend to consult on changing the way that we pay compensation, and I think, as part of my oral statement and looking at a refreshed programme in relation to TB eradication, this is something that we should certainly look at. I think it's the appropriate time to review those arrangements.

I should say, to establish the market value of an animal, a fully trained and experienced valuer must determine, by valuing the animal concerned on-farm, the price that the animal might reasonably obtain if it was for sale on the open market and was not affected by or exposed to TB. You mentioned compensation being capped at £5,000 for high-value animals, and I brought this in when we refreshed the TB eradication programme last time. And the advice at that time was, if you have cattle—and you referred to the fact that your constituent shows his cattle—it might be better then to look at insurance, because obviously the cap is £5,000.

The Cabinet committee on north Wales discusses a wide range of important topics. The first meeting of this Senedd term included a discussion on the pressures faced by health and social care partners, involving the chief executive of the health board, chief executive of NHS Wales and all local authority leaders.

Thank you very much for that answer, Minister, but I do have concerns that extend beyond the current crisis in ambulance response times. Last week, an arson attack at Rhyl Football Club occurred at the same time as a fire at a hotel in Prestatyn. North Wales Fire and Rescue Service reported that they were stretched dealing with those two incidents in my constituency. I dread to think what would have happened had there been a serious collision or a house fire elsewhere in the Vale of Clwyd that day. Minister, what steps will the north Wales Cabinet committee take to ensure that there is sufficient fire and rescue service provision covering north Wales, and my constituency in particular?

Well, I don't think that would be a decision for the north Wales Cabinet sub-committee. Obviously, the cover of emergency services across north Wales has to be appropriate at all times. You just mentioned two significant incidents that happened at the same time and, of course, while they're going on, there are always other incidents where our emergency services are being called to attend. And, obviously, there continues to be immense pressure particularly on the Welsh ambulance service at the current time. There's a really complex range, I think, of challenges at the moment that are coming together to get a perfect storm, but it's really important, obviously, the Minister for Health and Social Services works very closely with the Welsh Ambulance Services NHS Trust. You'll be aware of a review that is being undertaken by the trust at the current time, and obviously fire services come under the remit of the Minister for Social Justice, I think—it might be local government, but it will be a different Minister for that. But obviously, across Government, we will work very closely to make sure—. One of the good things that has happened over the previous few years that we've seen—I've certainly got one in my own constituency—is where emergency services come together in one building. So, in Wrexham, we've got the ambulance service and the fire service working together, and I think that has really improved issues.

And finally, question 10, Mabon ap Gwynfor.

The designation of nitrate vulnerable zones was a requirement of the EU nitrates directive, and the effectiveness of the NVZ designation was assessed as part of our commitment. Natural Resources Wales review NVZ designation on a regular basis to determine areas for new designation, continued designation or de-designation.

Thank you, Minister. The NVZs in Wales limit agriculturalists to spread no more than 170 kg of nitrates per hectare, whilst the zones in other nations enable farmers to spread up to 250 kg per hectare. This limitation means that slurry is held back and can't be spread and causes difficulties to farmers, or it will do so. Can you explain, therefore, what the rationale of the Welsh Government is for limiting to 170 kg here, whilst other places limit it to 250 kg?

We no longer have bespoke designated nitrate vulnerable zones in Wales, as you're aware, and on 27 January this year, I introduced the Water Resources (Control of Agricultural Pollution)(Wales) Regulations 2021, and as you know, those initial measures came into force on 1 April. Those regulations revoked and replaced the Nitrate Pollution Prevention (Wales) Regulations 2013, which obviously previously designated NVZs, and as you know, at the moment, permission has been granted for those regulations to be reviewed by the courts.

I thank the Minister.

No topical questions have been accepted.

Therefore, the next item is the 90-second statement, and the first statement is from Huw Irranca-Davies.

Diolch yn fawr iawn, Llywydd. Today, in my role as Chair of the cross-party group on active travel, and after many months of behind-the-scenes cross-party work, we launched the much-anticipated active travel school toolkit at Penyrheol Primary School in Gorseinon. In Wales, we've made important steps to change the way we get to school, but the figures show we need to do so much more, especially on cycling, where fewer than 1 per cent of Welsh children regularly ride a bike to school, in stark contrast to European neighbours like the Netherlands, where 49 per cent of pupils travel to school by bike every single day. So, it was lovely to join the headteacher Alison Williams and pupils and others today on my bike as well along with children who travel to school on their bikes and scooters and by shanks's pony, too. Active travel benefits the physical and mental well-being of children, reduces emissions, helps combat the climate crisis, reduce congestion and pollution around school gates, improves the attentiveness of pupils in the classroom by giving them an energetic start to the day, and so much more. And our toolkit is not a fixed prescription; each school faces a unique set of challenges, but with this initiative, we provide school leaders and parents and governors with the ideas and resources they need to determine their own path towards being an active travel school and community. And by emphasising the importance of persuading others to travel to school actively, this kit aims to create an overwhelming local consensus on active school travel.

From start to finish, this has been about collaboration, partnerships between schools and families on the ground and the behind-the-scenes work of the cross-party group. So, the toolkit will be sent to all Members of the Senedd, to ask them to link with schools on this active travel journey. Diolch yn fawr iawn, Llywydd.

Thank you very much. I'm sure that each and every one of you will wish to join me in congratulating the Welsh darts player, Jonny Clayton, on his excellent victory in the World Grand Prix of darts last Saturday evening, the first time he has won that championship. As it happens, he won by defeating his great friend and fellow Welshman Gerwyn Price in the final. In addition to winning the Grand Prix, one of the major darts titles, he's also won the Masters and the Premier League this year, and he was also part of the victorious Welsh team that won the World Cup of Darts last November when, of course, he played with his great friend Gerwyn Price. Yes, it has been quite a year for him.

Jonny, or The Ferret, as he's known, is a Welsh speaker who lives in Pontyberem and the people of Pont, the Gwendraeth Valley, Carmarthenshire and the whole of Wales take great pride in his success. But astonishingly, despite his success, he continues to work as a plasterer on a part-time basis for Carmarthenshire County Council, and I understand that he intends to continue with this work for some time to come. It's clear that he can turn his hand to virtually anything. I'm sure that we would all want to wish Jonny Clayton and Gerwyn Price well over the next 12 months as the darts season picks up pace, and congratulate him once again on his success over the weekend. Thank you.

Arthritis is the most prevalent disease in the world, and affects 1 in every 4 individuals. World Arthritis Day is globally commemorated on 12 October—which was yesterday—every year, to educate the public on timely diagnosis and management of arthritis. Today is the last day of National Arthritis Week here in the UK. The theme of this year’s campaign is 'Don’t Delay, Connect Today' with a focus on work with the strapline 'Time2Work'.

In 1996, Arthritis and Rheumatism International established World Arthritis Day. The aim of the day is to raise awareness of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases all over the world. Most people don’t realize that there are over 100 different kinds of arthritis. Arthritis is a disease that affects approximately 350 million people worldwide. There are around 120 million people currently living with a rheumatic disease like arthritis, in Europe.

Pain is the most disabling symptom of arthritis. Many myths surround the management of arthritis, which can be a barrier to effective management. Many believe that exercise is dangerous, that findings on imaging—that is, x-ray and MRI—dictate what one can do, and surgery and rest are the only treatments. We now know that excessive rest and avoidance of activity can make pain and disability due to arthritis worse. While a small proportion of individuals will benefit from surgery—that's like a knee replacement—not everybody requires surgery or will benefit from surgery. Graded exercises and activity are safe and good for your muscles and joints. Thank you, Presiding Officer.

Thank you.

The next item, therefore, is the motion to elect a Member to a committee, and I call on a member of the Business Committee to move the motion formally. Darren Millar.

I move.

It has been moved. The proposal, therefore, is to agree the motion. Does any Member object? No, therefore the motion is agreed in accordance with Standing Order 12.36.

We will now take a short break to allow a few changeovers in the Siambr.

Welcome back. The next item is item 5, a Member debate under Standing Order 11.21 on the community benefits of energy projects. I call on Rhun ap Iorwerth to move the motion.

Thank you very much, Dirprwy Lywydd, and I'm very grateful to the Business Committee in the first instance for giving me the opportunity to set out this motion before the Senedd today, and I'm also grateful to the Members who have supported the motion in front of us.

It's a very timely debate, I think. We are just before the beginning of COP26 in Glasgow. Later on today, Plaid Cymru will lead a debate on the energy sector and the nature and climate crisis.

Point 1 in the motion asks us to note the importance of renewable energy in our efforts to reduce our carbon footprint. I don’t think anybody's going to disagree with that. Energy, the way that we use energy, the way that we save energy, distribute it, and, yes, the way that we generate it, are issues that are at the heart of how successful we are going to be in the battle against climate change. But our relationship with energy is also at the heart of our daily lives, and I will be arguing this afternoon that it can have a major impact on the kinds of communities we live in.

I'm asking the Senedd to agree with the second statement in our motion, which is that there is a need to ensure that all energy developments bring benefits to the communities in which they're located, and this is so important, I think. We as a nation have so much to offer in terms of energy development; we could be supplying and fulfilling not just our needs in terms of clean energy and low-carbon energy and renewable energy, but we could be a major exporter, and that could bring significant economic benefits as well as environmental benefits.

But when we are asking communities to provide a home to developments of this kind, we need to realise that they can have a significant impact, so we need to support those communities and consider their needs and their aspirations as communities. I could refer to one proposed energy scheme in Anglesey that exists because of its community—the Morlais scheme to develop a tidal flow scheme on the coast of Anglesey, which is run by a social enterprise, Menter Môn, to keep the profits local. There are a whole host of similar schemes across Wales. I visited Ynni Ogwen recently. I welcome the principle in the Government's target to ensure that at least 1 GW of renewable energy in Wales should be under local ownership by 2030, and I'll remind you that one of the major functions of the Welsh energy company that Plaid Cymru wants to see established—with its headquarters in Anglesey, hopefully—would be to promote community schemes. But it's a very small minority of energy generation that currently happens in this way.

Let me contrast that kind of vision with what is happening on Anglesey at the moment in the field of solar energy. Now, recent decisions by the Welsh Government to earmark large parts of Anglesey as a solar development site have provided opportunities for major international companies to have an easier pathway towards permission to create solar farms—huge farms. The results are to be seen already. It's frightening how quickly things have happened. Enso Energy has announced plans for a 750-acre solar farm; Lightsource BP have plans to create 350 MW of solar energy that extends to over 2,000 acres; the Low Carbon company has identified 150 acres for Traffwll solar farm; EDF has bought a 190-acre site with permission for a solar farm on the north of the island, and that's on top of the plans that have been developed already. We're talking here about huge areas of land, including, of course, Môn Mam Cymru, good agricultural land, and we're talking about the communities around those areas and within those areas.

I have no doubt that Anglesey can make a major contribution in solar energy developments, but the truth is that the plans on the table are going to leave a huge footprint on parts of rural Wales with very little benefit for those communities—almost no jobs and no expectations in terms of wider financial benefits or otherwise. What do developers allege as local benefit? EDF's website says that £10,000 will be paid as a community benefit on an annual basis—only £10,000. Now, the developers of the Alaw Môn farm invite plans for a sustainable project in the area. They also promise that their scheme will provide opportunities to rest land that has been intensively farmed—I think that that is an insulting attempt to put a spin on the loss of agricultural land.

'The provision of community benefits from renewables development is currently a voluntary initiative.'

And that's one of the problems. I put forward a motion for new legislation to the Senedd recently after the Senedd legislative team confirmed that there would be a need for primary legislation to demand an assessment of community benefit of this kind. I wasn't selected in the ballot, but the debate is certainly still live. In that context, I welcome RWE's statement today:

'We support the concept that there should be a legislated standard amount of community benefit per megawatt or megawatt hour produced from projects that proceed.'

That would, I think, be an important step forward. But benefit can come in other forms too. It can mean real promises for jobs—economic prosperity of that kind—strengthening supply chains; cheaper energy bills, possibly, or, more environmentally positive, investment in energy efficiency within those communities; charging networks for electric vehicles; home batteries or solar energy for the home that is subsidised. What about sharing profits genuinely with communities? Buying permission for the solar farm: that's what EDF did. What about the profits that the company that got that permission and sold it on? A proportion of that company's profits, I think, should stay local.

But it's not just listing benefits of that kind that I would want developers to do through holding an assessment. That's not just what we are talking about, but measuring the impact on rural areas, on losing those green areas that are so important to us; the impact on property prices in rural areas, and the impact on people's quality of life too. That's difficult to put a price on, perhaps, but it's so important. Considering that the impact of an individual scheme, or the cumulative impact of multiple schemes, and that's the problem that we are facing on Anglesey—. Considering that impact, what I would want to see is efforts to provide that energy generation that we do need in different ways.

Rather than using a block of thousands of acres, what about hundreds of smaller blocks, following the energy distribution lines— more landowners benefiting a little, rather than a few landowners benefiting a great deal? What about using, through strengthening the distribution system, agricultural shed roofs, factory roofs, the roofs of chapels, churches, schools, community centres and so on? What about installing panels alongside land boundaries and hedgerows over large areas, creating biodiverse corridors, while keeping the fields productive? What about verges on roads? One idea that was suggested to me today: using the central reservation of the A55 for solar panels. I don't know; maybe that's possible too.

So, let's think outside of the box. By being creative, I think that we could generate energy on a very large scale by working with, rather than against, communities. I have talked about solar mainly today, because that is the major issue with regard to energy projects on Anglesey, but it could include all kinds of other generation methods.

Some have argued with me that not thinking in this creative way could create a risk of turning people against renewable energy projects and could prevent progress. One of the major net zero prizes would be to be able to engage with communities with regard to decarbonisation and facilitate it. We are already seeing some frustration locally, I have to say, as a result of losing influence over whether plans will receive permission or not, and I think that holding the community benefit assessments would bring the community back to the heart of planning decisions with regard to energy. I look forward to hearing the contributions this afternoon and the response of the Government.

Thank you, Rhun, for bringing this debate forward, and whilst you do have some concerns about solar, it’s fair to say, along the north Wales coast, those concerns now extend to the huge windfarm projects that are coming our way.

Dirprwy Lywydd, we know that around 58,000 work in the energy and environment sectors in Wales, generating over £4.8 billion in revenue, and this sector is primed for continued expansion over the coming years. Wales currently has 86 operational windfarms, the potential to generate around 10 GW from marine energy, a mature solar energy sector, and a tidal range capable of providing significant generation opportunities along the Welsh coastline.

The Marine Strategy Regulations 2010 required the Welsh Government to take the necessary measures to achieve or maintain good environmental status of marine waters by 31 December 2020, and the Minister and I know that that deadline has been missed. Marine biodiversity continues to decline. Why not reverse the trend by seeing offshore windfarms and the seabed connectors used as the basis for seabed ecosystem recovery and blue carbon sequestration?

I’ve been undertaking some very constructive discussions with Professor Chris Baines who lives in my constituency, and he’s a renowned author on such matters. He has rightly outlined that if windfarms can become—. If they’re going to be there, can they become sanctuary areas with minimal seabed disturbance? And if this can be combined with proactive habitat restoration in the form of such things as artificial reef application to the turbine bases, then the wind energy infrastructure could actually make a unique and enormously positive contribution to marine recovery and carbon net zero, while subscribing to our biodiversity and conservation aims. So, Minister, could I ask, what steps are you taking to encourage the involvement of any future renewable energy developers in Welsh marine habitat regeneration projects such as this? What steps are you taking to encourage the diversion of community spend towards planting efforts, like those of seagrass meadows, which are known to capture carbon up to 35 times faster than tropical rain forests?

The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds’s proposal for a marine development plan would provide clarity on how much development is sustainable within Welsh seas, and where it is best placed. In reply to a written question to you, Minister, you confirmed that the Welsh Government were initiating a two-year programme of work to map potential strategic resource areas. So, with this in mind, would you update us on the progress of this mapping activity and confirm to us today a deadline for delivery?

Can the Member conclude now, please?

Yes. And, indeed, the impact of night visuals on our much treasured darkened skies. We need renewable energy, but I implore this Welsh Government, and the Minister, to ensure that any new renewable schemes, that there is that perfect healthy balance between our biodiversity and conservation efforts. Thank you.

Alun Davies.

I'm grateful to you, Deputy Presiding Officer. I'm grateful as well to Rhun ap Iorwerth for bringing forward this debate. When I was reading the order paper and I read the title of the debate—community benefits of energy—the word that stuck out at me was 'community', of course, and it's something that, quite often, is forgotten when we talk about having a much richer energy mix than we have at present. And I would like to put the word 'community' back into our energy policy.

I'm very pleased that both Ministers are here with us this afternoon. I think, in the past, it's probably been true that the machinery of Government has actually worked against having a Welsh energy policy rather than enabled it. Certainly, when I was in Government with responsibility for energy, I was one of three Ministers in that Cabinet who had responsibility for energy, and the inevitable consequence, of course, wasn't a single energy policy but three energy policies, and we managed to achieve virtually nothing except a publication of plans and strategies, because you had a level of confusion. The Government didn't know what its policy was, and I believe that the opportunity we have now, with the new machinery of Government, is for the Government to have a clear idea of what it seeks to achieve, but more importantly, how it seeks to achieve it.

I believe we do need to look hard at what the energy mix is going to be in the future. The recent news about—[Interruption.] Yes, if you let me finish the sentence. The recent news about the development of modular nuclear reactors is good news, I believe. It might well be good news for sir Fôn; it might well be good news for other sites as well, and good news in terms of lowering our carbon output at the same time as securing baseload supply.

Thank you. I found your comments really interesting, but do you not think it's a bit disappointing for anybody watching this debate that both Ministers are on their phones?

No, it isn't. I think we need to elevate the debate rather than try to reduce it. And, do you know, Jayne—? I'm looking at you, Jayne. Janet, I would implore you not simply to read out a speech, but to appreciate what that means, and that goes beyond simply reading somebody else's words. And I think it's important—[Interruption.] I think it's important that we have a serious conversation about where this is going. So, allow me to make progress, please.

I appreciate what the new Government is seeking to achieve, and I appreciate and I very much agree with what both Ministers here have said, at different times, about what their ambitions and what their visions are. What I would say to them is this: keep a close eye. Quite often we talk about the deficient settlement that we have as being a bad thing, but in this case, actually, in energy terms, it means that we could have a much stronger focus on the community aspects of where we are. And my fear is that we would go down the road that Rhun and Janet have described, where we have very large-scale developments that are inappropriate for the places in which they are placed and located, and also inappropriate as to what we want to achieve as part of a wider climate policy and a wider community policy.

For me, what I would like to see the Welsh Government focusing on is distributed generation; a focus on what a community can do in order to deliver generation, both for its needs and for the needs of the locality. I'm interested to understand how the Minister, in responding to this debate, will speak about how we can deliver the mechanisms and means necessary to have local generation providing energy for local needs, but also contributing to a grid. And I want to see the Welsh Government working at this.

When I was doing some research on this recently, I realised that the last time the Welsh Government had uploaded any information on community energy to its website was five years ago. There's been very little work from the Welsh Government in the last Senedd on how we will deliver community energy. The evaluation of the previous community energy scheme, Ynni'r Fro, was quite mixed, but that's not necessarily a bad thing because lessons were learnt. Some of the mistakes that were made were made in seeking to deliver a scheme for the first time, and that's always going to happen. But we're not learning the lessons of that and applying it in a new way, with new schemes to support community regeneration. And, as a consequence, those of us who represent different parts of this country are put in the terrible situation of having to say, 'Yes, we support renewables, but do we really support the industrialisation of a community, the industrialisation of a landscape that at the same time we wish to protect?' And we don't want to be in that situation, but we are being forced into that situation because we don't have the rich energy policy that delivers the community generation and the distributed generation that means that we can achieve our climate ambitions, our energy ambitions, our social ambitions and our economic ambitions. And I believe that—. And I can see even without my glasses, Deputy Presiding Officer, that your patience is being exhausted. [Laughter.]

I did give extra time because you had that intervention, but you were stretching it a little bit. [Laughter.] Altaf Hussain.

Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. I am delighted to be a co-sponsor of this debate. We are a country with the most incredible landscape and seascape, rich in windy mountain ranges and spectacular coastlines, with the ability to generate green energy in a way that would benefit not only Welsh communities, but add significantly to the UK’s future energy needs.

There is of course the potential for green energy to provide a higher number of jobs in the future, highly skilled and better paid in developing and constructing the new technologies to deliver our energy needs. A new industrial revolution fit for the twenty-first century. The Welsh Government has talked of the potential growth in the green economy, and whilst I welcome economic development and renewal based on utilising the might of our environment, I know that energy developments need also to be focused on the benefits that such investments can bring to local communities.

There are of course the obvious local benefits to infrastructure, and the chances of employment in planning and engineering, but there are also many examples of energy projects that have worked to provide additional benefits to their local communities. Examples from some energy developments have included measures to combat fuel poverty, with funds being made available to support the retrofit of local homes to make them more energy efficient.

Some companies have invested in community funds, locally established and managed by local people, providing grants to organisations and projects, not just as a one-off but as a sustained community investment. In some cases, these local funds have used hundreds of thousands of pounds.

There are, however, challenges for the Government. Ministers need to understand the potential of their role as enablers. There needs to be a greater ambition in Government to work with industry to deliver new energy projects that will change the economic profile of Wales for the better, increase the supply and range of jobs, and maintain local benefits to the community.

To attract development in Wales, we need people with the vision and skill to articulate why energy developers should invest here. Why come here when they could invest elsewhere in the UK? What is it about Wales that makes development here an attractive proposition? If Government wants a green jobs revolution, then it needs to build a relationship with those in the sector—ambition on its own won’t make it happen. And it needs to be a relationship where developers understand the importance we place on community, utilising the benefits of investment and working together to build a greener Wales, not forgetting that, here in Wales, we are very near to nature, and we don’t want to spoil that by erecting 850 ft tall turbines, making our Wales ugly, as is planned for Y Bryn. Thank you very much, Presiding Officer.

I had a very timely visit last week to the Pen y Cymoedd windfarm. For anyone not familiar, it's the largest onshore windfarm in England and Wales, and it straddles the top of my constituency and several others. It has got 76 turbines, hardly any of which are visible from the valley floor, and in an average year it will power the equivalent of 188,000 homes. To put that in perspective, that's about 15 per cent of Welsh households—a really important contribution. It has also put a lot of money in the Welsh economy; 52 per cent of the original £400 million investment went directly to Welsh firms, and this secured work for more than 1,000 workers in Wales during its construction. It has created apprenticeship opportunities, and it has also protected the environment and boosted biodiversity. I'm a species champion for the nightjar, which nests at this site, so I've welcomed the opportunity to be able to follow this aspect of their work.

The windfarm has also operated a particularly ambitious community benefit fund. Each year until 2043, £1.8 million is available for businesses and groups across the Cynon, Afan, Neath and Rhondda valleys. And importantly, I think, the fund hasn't been imposed by external agents. Rather, the people who have been involved in drawing up the vision are the local experts—people who live and work in those communities, who know and use local services, who understand the area they live in, what's available and what's missing. This fund has been supporting communities since the windfarm went operational in 2017. Between then and April 2021, in my constituency alone, 129 organisations and businesses have been directly supported. That funding, just to groups in my constituency, is worth around £3 million. Some grants are small, for example hundreds of pounds made available through a microfund grant, but other funds, accessed through the vision fund, are more substantial, for projects that contribute to delivering the communities' vision.

So, what's been supported with that money? Well, businesses, choirs and cultural groups, mental health support and well-being promotion, environmental initiatives, community halls, heritage projects, sports teams, family groups, schemes to support older people and to commemorate those who served their country. The fund has also supported transformational large-scale projects like Aquadare, the popular splash pad in Aberdare park. It's helped repurpose St Elvan's church to become an attractive community space, and it's played a role in creating the newly opened Cynon Linc community hub. The fund has supported everything from arts societies to defibrillator charities, and, more recently, it launched a COVID emergency fund, which can be accessed to provide urgent-needed cashflow or to support diversification for something COVID-specific. Over £0.5 million has been distributed through that to support 32 businesses and organisations, and it's enabled a further 23 COVID response projects to get off the ground and support those most in need within local communities.

Can the Member conclude now, please?

[Inaudible.]—economic benefits. So, there is much more that we can do, and that must be the focus of the Welsh Government.

Thank you to the Member from Anglesey for bringing this debate to the Chamber.

Wales has a wealth of renewable and green energy potential, and it would be remiss of me not to start, given that Rhun ap Iorwerth has secured this debate, by mentioning the opportunities in Ynys Môn. He's mentioned solar, but the Wylfa Newydd nuclear energy site is a campaign I know his constituency colleague, the Member of Parliament for Ynys Môn, Virginia Crosbie, has championed powerfully. But I'd like to focus on a project off the coast of my own constituency of Carmarthen West and South Pembrokeshire: the groundbreaking, multimillion pound Blue Gem Wind project, a joint venture between TotalEnergies, one of the world's largest energy companies, and Simply Blue Energy, a pioneering Celtic sea energy developer. The project will develop floating offshore wind, known as FLOW, in the waters of the Celtic sea.

FLOW is set to become a key technology in the fight against climate change, with over 80 per cent of the world's wind resource in waters deeper than 60m. Independent studies have suggested there could be as much as 50 GW of electricity capacity available in the Celtic sea waters off the UK and Irish coasts. This renewable energy resource could play a key role in the UK meeting the 2050 net-zero target required to mitigate climate change. Floating wind—FLOW—will provide new low-carbon supply chain opportunities, support coastal communities and create long-term benefits for the region. In my own constituency, it is estimated that Blue Gem's first 1 billion watts of floating wind energy could potentially deliver over 3,000 jobs and £682 million in supply chain opportunities, opening up a whole new world of offshore renewables with Pembrokeshire at its heart, unquestionably benefiting the community.

The first demonstration project in the Celtic sea, the 96 MW Erebus project, will become one of the largest floating offshore wind projects in the world when constructed in 2026. This will then be followed by Valorous, a 300 MW early commercial project, again, in the Celtic sea, which would see nearly 280,000 homes powered per year, while saving over 455,000 tonnes of carbon emissions per year. But what is truly incredible about the Blue Gem Wind project and the opportunities that present themselves in the Celtic sea is that not one area alone truly benefits, and neither can it deliver the project alone. It has to be spread across a number of areas and number of ports. This brings further spread of the community benefit of these new projects, as skilled jobs and economic benefits are not concentrated in a small area.

Communities in south-west Wales, the south-east of the Republic of Ireland and shipyards in Northern Ireland and Scotland can all benefit from this project. But these benefits aren't going to appear without active involvement from Government on all levels. Commercial projects such as these work at a speed not normally seen within governmental departments, and I know the Member from Blaenau Gwent raised the historical concerns around energy policy previously. Speed is of the essence when it comes to these projects, to ensure that they are not missed and the community benefit isn't missed either. We need to understand the constraints that these businesses and projects work under and do what we can to streamline the process. This isn't a call for bypassing key planning and regulatory constraints, but working in a speedy and constructive manner to help these projects get off the ground and deliver their environmental, economic and community benefits. In every corner of Wales, we have examples of projects striving to make a difference. They have the determination, they have the enterprise, we just need the confidence to unleash it. Diolch yn fawr.

I call on the Deputy Minister for Climate Change, Lee Waters.

Diolch yn fawr, Dirprwy Lywydd. I think there's been a great deal of consensus in the Senedd this afternoon on the importance of renewable energy and how vital it is to make sure that this is rooted in our communities, both in terms of getting acceptance, but also in terms of realising the benefits beyond the broader benefits or helping us to reach net zero. We agree with the Member's position that we should ensure our communities feel the benefits of hosting these essential developments, and I've a lot of sympathy with the discomfort he expressed about large-scale solar farms, in particular, popping up across the country, not mentioning any in particular. I think we are better off focusing solar on buildings than we are taking up large bits of land.

This was a theme that came across in a number of Members' speeches; there's obviously a balance to be struck on the environmental impact. Janet Finch-Saunders, in her remarks, made reference to the ocean bed regeneration. That's an important point, as well as other examples given of where developments weren't quite a fit with their local communities. This, I think, is one of the delicate balances we have to strike. We know that, in order to reach net zero, we're going to have to make more cuts in our emissions in the next 10 years than we have over the last 30 years, and that pace and scale are going to have to quicken in the years beyond that. So, there's an imperative for us to act at scale, at pace, but we also need to bring communities with us and we need to be mindful of the other impacts of these developments. We're going to have to feel our way through that, frankly; there is no template for doing that sensitively.

I completely agree with the thrust of the debate about the ownership of renewable assets locally, and we must develop strong Welsh supply chains and job opportunities, as Samuel Kurtz just outlined. In terms of the specific project he mentioned of the floating wind in the Celtic sea waters, I know my colleague Julie James spoke at a UK ports conference this morning, and it is a project that we are looking at carefully. We want to develop as many different varieties of projects as we can, and, as I say, involving communities is key.

The most effective way of securing benefit is through local ownership, and our programme for government has a target to increase public and community-owned renewables by 100 MW by 2026. We recognise the need to have support in place to meet this ambition. The Welsh Government energy service is doing excellent work supporting public bodies and communities to develop schemes, and we are giving financial support to progress projects. To give one example, the energy service helped the Egni co-op to invest more than £4 million in rooftop solar across Wales, generating free power to community organisations and to schools, in fact, including shares in the co-op to some schools in the upper Amman valley, which I think is an excellent project I'm keen to see how we can spread more widely across Wales.

Will you take an intervention?

I will, but I would just say to him that I wouldn't mistake the uploading of information to a website with a lack of activity on community energy.

Well, there's certainly a lack of activity in terms of communicating what you're doing to anybody in the world at all. But the point I'd like to make is that, quite often, and it's one of the lessons from Ynni'r Fro, a great deal of Government time is spent arguing over proposals with other parts of the public sector. And what is required from Government is to ensure that Government not only sets the lead, delivers some of the seed funding that is required in order to do this, but also ensures that you don't have public money being spent on two sets of barristers arguing with each other over a single application. And Government could take a real lead in that.

Well, clearly that's unarguable. And one of the focuses of the deep dive that I'm starting tomorrow is going to be how we energise and mobilise a coalition for change across the public and private sector to really get some pace going. Because, as we all agree here this afternoon, the prize is great and the cost of inaction is too difficult to contemplate. Diolch.

I call on Rhun ap Iorwerth to reply to the debate.

Diolch yn fawr, Dirprwy Lywydd. I think this has been a really valuable discussion, actually, and can I first of all thank the Minister for those words, when he said that he is coming close to establishing, hopefully, a body that will encourage and promote publicly owned energy in Wales? That sounds very much to me that Plaid Cymru's long-standing campaign to establish an ynni Cymru, an energy Wales body, has come to fruition and I'm delighted that it sounds as if Welsh Government is about to put something very, very similar to that in place. And I think that that's something very, very positive, because it's a means, I think, to have a real focus on the kind of energy developments that we want in Wales.

Thanks for the contributions. Yes, some interesting ideas, not just community benefits; Janet Finch-Saunders talking about even environmental benefits that we can gain from renewable energy projects, enhancing marine biodiversity, even. But we're talking today about the community benefits—I'm pleased that in Vikki Howells's constituency, she's happy that the benefits are coming—but you said yourself that they're voluntary, and that is the point here: we need mechanisms to ensure that they flow automatically from such projects, and whilst no, the motion doesn't mention community and co-operative energy, I'm sure you will have picked up on the fact that that is at the very heart of the kind of vision that I certainly have and I think most Members here have too.

Just a special mention to Alun Davies and his contribution: exactly the kind of vision that I have, and in saying that 'community' is a word that has largely been forgotten from energy policy and it needs to be reinstated there, that is exactly the point, I think, that I'm trying to make today. We can have all sorts of bold visions in terms of reaching our climate change goals, which absolutely we need to pursue with vigour, but we have to remember that many of the projects take place within, and affect directly, communities where people actually live, and it has to be a symbiosis.

So, the Minister said in opening his words that there is a lot of consensus here today, and I think that's very, very important. I didn't quite pick up on whether Government is going to be voting for the motion as it stands today; I do certainly hope that the Senedd today will back this motion. The Minister said that we have to bring communities with us. Local ownership absolutely has to be the aim, but as it stands, Welsh Government has enabled and empowered the large multinationals to pick on parts of Ynys Môn and other parts of Wales as areas where they think they have an automatic, almost, right to pursue their developments. That can't be the case, and I will gladly work with Government to be a bridge between my communities and Government in putting forward the case that somehow, those multinational companies have to go beyond the voluntary, have to go beyond the lowest possible threshold they think they can get away with when it comes to local benefits, and hopefully, we can work towards strong regulation at the very least, and I think legislation also to make sure that our communities don't become victims of renewable and other energy developments, but become real partners in them, too. Thank you.

The proposal is to agree the motion. Does any Member object? No. Therefore, the motion is agreed in accordance with Standing Order 12.36.

Item 6 on the agenda is the Plaid Cymru debate on the energy sector and the climate and nature emergencies, and I call on Delyth Jewell to move the motion.

Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. Any emergency requires urgency in response. That is the message at the heart of our debate today, because an emergency is defined as requiring immediate action; it is what makes it an emergency. We in Wales have declared both nature and climate emergencies in recent years, but to date, enough action has not been taken to reinforce those declarations. I fear that waiting is not a luxury we can any longer afford. Wales and the world face climate and nature disaster, and just as these crises are intertwined and their causes interconnected, so too must their solutions be interwoven. We must have parity in approaches to tackling both of these crises, both climate change and biodiversity decline, because Dirprwy Lywydd, we stand at a turning point in human history. It's not often that we can truly say something of that magnitude, but it is true. The choices we make now or those we fail to make won't just set the scene for generations, they'll ensure whether or not that scene still exists.

COP15 opens this week and COP26 is on the horizon. Now, they offer the world a chance to turn the tide of climate change and biodiversity decline. The stakes are high, but many fear that the frameworks that will come out of COP could be a cop-out, a collective burying of heads in the sands of time at the very moment that those sands run out of the hourglass, and at the hour of destiny world leaders could fall short. But it needn't be that way, and Wales can help set the tone. Instead of waiting for COP26 and COP15 to conclude and take from those frameworks our own solutions, we could show the way and prove again how a country the size of Wales can be world leading.

I said that we can't afford to wait, but the declarations we've made and the conferences that await us afford us an opportunity to be radical, to be innovative and to be trailblazing, because urgency is required. The climate emergency is already hitting our communities hard. The Rhondda, Llanrwst, Ystrad Mynach—streets in almost every corner of our country have faced horrific floods. Homes and businesses have been destroyed, and the threat of landslips from unsafe coal tips looms over our heads. Wildfires and droughts have become commonplace, and temperatures that break new records and wreak destruction are set every year, inexorably rising like the seas at our feet.

Just as some things go up, so others go down. The decline in biodiversity on our planet is set to wipe out a million species. In Wales, the RSPB and other partners have warned us in their State of Nature 2019 report that 666 species in Wales are at threat from extinction, and 73 are already gone, a calamity we shouldn't just note and move on from. Those species have left us because of how we live our lives. Butterflies have declined by 52 per cent since 1976, and 30 per cent of terrestrial mammal species are at risk of disappearing from Wales altogether, like the red squirrel and water voles. Dirprwy Lywydd, the science is clear, and Wales is feeling the impacts of these co-existing crises, the one that charts forever upwards, the other that pulls us down into the depths of loss.

So, what can we do to change this? Well, the second part of our motion sets out a series of bold and ambitious actions that Wales can and must take in order to grapple with the severity of these crises. We call on the Government to maximise our nation's potential for renewable energy development by establishing a state-backed energy development company. We call for the development of a net-zero workforce in the energy sector, the expansion of renewable capacity through investment in upgrades to the electricity grid, a strategy for Welsh ports that would support the offshore wind sector, and a marine development plan that will provide certainty to energy developers and ensure that renewable developments don't get planned in the areas that are the most ecologically sensitive.

I said that we have resources at our disposal, but not all Welsh resources are under our control, which is why we furthermore call on the Welsh Government to seek the full devolution of the management of the Crown Estate and the full devolution of energy powers, to ensure we have all levers we need to tackle these crises head on.

Now, a lot of what we're talking about in this debate will be on a massive scale, global targets and pathways and plans that stretch decades into the future, but the impacts of Government inaction in these areas aren't only measured in graphs or numbers or pylons in the sky. People's lives on the ground are affected in a devastatingly personal way too. The recent energy crisis that we're still in the midst of has underlined our dependency on markets and resources that are outside our control, and how susceptible we are to their shocks. Customers face higher bills and the industry faces supply cuts and shut downs. Families least able to afford higher prices will be hit most harshly. The floods I mentioned earlier don't just devastate houses, they rip people's lives apart. That is the consequence of inaction.

I have selected the two amendments to the motion. If amendment 1 is agreed, amendment 2 will be deselected. I call on Janet Finch-Saunders to move amendment 1, tabled in the name of Darren Millar.

Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. I move this amendment in the name of Darren Millar, and I'm very grateful once again to Plaid Cymru for this important debate. Now, with COP15 under way, it is very appropriate that we ensure that our Welsh Government is doing its utmost to tackle the climate and, indeed, our nature crises. Across the Siambr, there is agreement on the need to achieve net zero by 2050 and to protect at least 30 per cent of land and sea by 2030. But where we differ is on how we go achieving those aims.

Plaid, of course, are true Welsh nationalists, seeking further devolution of powers and creation of a state-backed company, a new state-backed company, but why would you want this Welsh Government to do that when only a few weeks ago, when we were talking about the coal tips, they were looking to put that responsibility on the UK Parliament, saying we haven't got the resources here in Wales? [Interruption.] No, no, no, it's called devolution. Why would you want this Welsh Government that has wasted hundreds of millions of pounds, such as £221 million on uncompetitive enterprise zones, £9.3 million on flawed initial funding of the Circuit of Wales, and £130 million on propping up Cardiff Airport?

Now, the UK Government—Conservative—on the other hand is very much willing to prove it wants to deliver a green revolution, and here in Wales, with over £40 million committed to support the cluster of industries in south Wales to transition to net zero, £4.8 million being made available, subject to business case and other approvals, to support—[Interruption.]—to support a Holyhead hydrogen hub, and they've already committed £90 million to innovative Welsh net-zero projects.

Now, I was clear in the last Senedd that 'Future Wales: the national plan 2040' should have addressed the serious problems highlighted by stakeholders, and that is the severe lack of grid capacity in mid Wales. Only today I've been talking with energy developers, and they are really concerned about the situation in mid Wales. And it's something that you as a Welsh Government need to grasp that nettle on, and work cohesively with the UK Government to ensure that we can get that grid capacity increased. We need to know what deadline has been set to deliver the long-term plan and what steps will be taken to improve capacity in the short term, so that infrastructure can accommodate demand required to electrify our transport and heating infrastructure.

The Welsh Government must maximise the potential for renewable energy development by establishing a package of support for private investment in any new schemes, and this harks back to what you were saying earlier, Rhun, about small schemes. The Minister for Rural Affairs decided to withdraw really vital business rates support for privately-owned small-scale hydroelectric projects. Why not instead send a clear message to our farmers and land managers that the Welsh Government actually does support them in diversifying through investing in renewables? If you don't act now, the startling evidence of the last 'Energy Generation in Wales' report will simply be repeated: an increase in the total hydropower with capacity of less than 0.2 per cent; an increase of less than 1 per cent for Welsh solar photovoltaics capacity; no large-scale battery storage projects commissioned at all in 2019; and only a 0.6 MWh increase in domestic and small-scale commercial battery storage installations.

Sorry, I just wanted to say: can you add to that the Swansea tidal lagoon?

Absolutely. I supported the Swansea tidal lagoon, and I—. At the end of the day, yes, I support that—so that and a north Wales one.

As Margaret Thatcher said, 'You may have to fight a battle more than once to win it.' So, I'd encourage the Welsh Government to work with our private businesses and the UK Government to keep fighting to see this green revolution in Wales, and let's make this a great global energy nation once again. Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd.

I call on the Minister for Climate Change, Julie James, to formally move amendment 2, tabled in the name of Lesley Griffiths.

Formally.

Thank you very much, Deputy Presiding Officer. I'm fortunate enough to be able to walk along the River Taff to the Senedd, and, as I walk, I often reflect on how many of the areas around the river might be flooded within a few years unless we work together. And this is more important than party politics. We must work together—Governments on a global level and also the Welsh Government, the UK Government and local government.

The stark warning from the chair of the Environment Agency in England is 'adapt or die', and we all know there is no Offa's Dyke when it comes to climate emergency. But we need to find Welsh solutions here for global realities. To do so, we need the control. We need the levers to make a real difference. Improvements in our constitutional arrangement have been frozen by the Tory Government in Westminster. Whilst Boris Johnson is enjoying painting in his luxurious villa, the climate emergency results in glaciers melting, and here we are denied the tools we need to act.

To tackle this crisis, the Welsh Government must seek the devolution of full energy powers. The Welsh Government should govern Welsh resources for the people of Wales and for the environmental and economic benefit of Wales, today and for the future.

We cannot allow yet again the resources of Wales to be exploited by others. Over a decade ago in this place, Leanne Wood said this:

'During the height of the coal industry, enormous profits were generated from the natural resources of Wales yet almost all of the money bled out of the country and lined the pockets of people elsewhere.'

We cannot allow this to happen again.

Wales can produce the power we need from renewable sources and export energy across the world. From this place, the port of Cardiff, global Wales, international Wales, exported coal to the four corners of the world. We can be a powerhouse yet again.

What we cannot do is to wait and wait for meagre handouts from a disinterested Westminster Government. As seen in the future ports report, which was published today, the Crown Estate is auctioning leases for the development of offshore wind and other renewable technologies. This is despite the fact that the Welsh Government has responsibility for renewable energy for projects up to 350 MW. Lucrative revenues from the Crown Estate leases that should flow here to the Welsh Treasury are instead disappearing to a pot in Whitehall, with a generous 25 per cent cut to the royal family. Money that could make a difference to families here in Wales is going straight into the bank accounts of billionaires.

Having been shocked by the progress made by the SNP after the independence referendum, the Crown Estate was devolved in Scotland, but the so-called voice of Wales in the Cabinet, Simon Hart, is against that; Wales isn't good enough for those powers, according to him. But the figures are striking. Listen to these: 27 per cent of Welsh energy comes from renewables, as compared to 61 per cent in Scotland.

The Crown Estate's control of our seabed, let alone large tracts of our land, means that Wales is losing out on a green goldrush that is currently benefiting Scotland, and this is the same thing that's happened across the centuries. And that's the irony of the UK's neoliberal energy market—state-backed energy companies from across Europe are taking advantage of Wales's resources and are spending that to help their own public services back at home, whilst our public services are cracking at the seams due to lack of investment.

Today, in a green alliance event in Westminster, Ed Miliband stated that Rachel Reeves would be the first UK green Chancellor. Well, here in Wales, we don't need to wait for a Labour Government. Why not get the powers so that Rebecca Evans can be the first green finance Minister and show the way to your colleagues in London?

Instead of the lack of ambition of Westminster, we need to secure the powers to power Wales. And I will finish with this point.

If we are to maximise our renewable potential, we must do so with our own two feet and our own two hands; we cannot rely on others, especially a disinterested Westminster Government. The resources of Wales should be governed by the Government of Wales—

Conclude now, please.

—for the people of Wales, for the future generations of Wales.

It's as simple as that. Thank you.

We are in danger of being paralysed by the extent of the challenge in front of us, but, really, it is no use wringing our hands in despair; we really do have to grasp the moment, and we all have a part to play.

But I really don't think it's much use throwing darts at the UK Government to ask them for more devolution, because they are absolutely not interested. They hate devolution and they are doing everything possible to claw it back from us, using leaving the European Union as the opportunity to do it. 'Not a penny less' we were told would happen as a result of Brexit—that went well; £137 million less from the rural development programme and the hijacking of all the structural funds into their so-called shared prosperity fund. 'Take back control' didn't mean empowering local communities, just more power for the mega rich, who are now buying their influence over the UK Government ruling party.

So, let's forget what the UK Government isn't going to do for us; we know that. I agree with Rhys ab Owen that we could produce enough clean energy in order to decarbonise our domestic energy market, and we could be selling it to the countless numbers of people who want to buy it off us, but we haven't managed to do that so far, and we need to understand a little bit better as to why we've actually seen a dip in the production of renewable energy in Wales over the last few years. Perhaps I should declare an interest here, as my partner is a consultant with Bute Energy, who are prospecting in Wales. But we really do need to think about how we are going to accelerate the use of green renewable energy, because there is a huge demand for energy, both here in Wales and in the rest of Europe.

We hear the need to decarbonise our transport, and some of that is going to be about transferring to electric cars from fossil fuels, but we can't be affording to plug in these electric cars using the dirty fossil fuels that we're trying to get away from, so we've got to have a massive boost in renewable energy production. We've also got to decarbonise all our housing, and that means not just retrofitting all the existing housing that's already been built, which is nearly all our housing, but we've also got to put a stop to all these mass house builders who want to continue to build houses that are not fit for purpose. So, I do hope that the Minister is able to tell us when we are going to upgrade Part L of the building regulations to ensure that we're only producing zero-carbon standards in the future.

We also need to think about everything we do as individuals. And to be able to make the right choices, we've got to understand what the cost is of buying a particular product rather than another one. Because it's no point just exporting our carbon emissions by saying, 'I won't buy that because that produces too many carbon emissions here. We'll get somebody abroad to do this for us.'

Thank you to Plaid Cymru for tabling this important and timely debate today, which clearly has a broad reach in terms of its title—there are all sorts of avenues that Members could go down in relation to this debate today.

I would also like to welcome and certainly support the first section of the motion from Plaid Cymru, which seeks to note all of the good work that has taken place in various organisations and in various parts of the country as well. I'm going to try and keep my contribution as practical and as about delivery as possible.

When it comes to green energy solutions, for me, there are three pertinent points that I'll also make my contribution focus on. And the first, I think, which we need to discuss and continue to consider, is the range of energy solutions that we would want to see in Wales. It's been clear, hasn't it, in recent weeks and months, that perhaps we've had too many of our eggs in one green energy basket, which has caused us to run into trouble, because we've seen, haven't we, that the lack of wind through September means that there is less energy available for us to use?

I think we should be considering, as parliamentarians, the focus on energy schemes that seem to be cheap in terms of their initial installation and initial costs, but we really do need to consider: are they consistent? Are they reliable? What is the macro impact of those schemes that have been put in place in the past and what other technologies should we be looking to support in the future? My colleague for Aberconwy mentioned the tidal and energy scheme, which I know Mr Hedges also brought up in terms of an intervention, but there are schemes like tidal energy—technologies like that—that can provide reliable, predictable energy for us in the future. I'll take an intervention.

Yes. I just want to remind you, as a new Member, that we tried so hard, across all parties, to get the UK Government in the last Parliament to back the tidal energy scheme and they passed it by. And really, the tide has gone out on this one. It's absolutely desperate and now we are in the position we are in.

I certainly acknowledge that and I will continue to support, from my side, the benefits of tidal energy. That particular scheme may not have been as effective as others, but it doesn't mean that tidal energy and the technology is a bad thing. And the good work in places like Morlais, looking at tidal energy and how that can be enhanced, I think is really important and what we should continue to support. Also what tidal energy offers us, as the Member will understand, is mitigating some of the impacts of climate change, which perhaps hasn't been properly considered by Governments fully in the past.

And the other solution, which hasn't been mentioned as much here today—it has been mentioned—is around nuclear energy, of course. That's a zero-emission clean energy, which is reliable. Actually, we have some good sites, as we know, across Wales at the moment, and other technologies that Mr Kurtz mentioned earlier, which perhaps are not as well proven at the moment, but it doesn't mean that we should shy away from those, rather than just going back to the old ways of doing things all the time. That was my first point. I'm afraid that the time is going here, Deputy Presiding Officer; I will try to canter through a bit more quickly, perhaps.

Secondly, the other area that I think is vital for us to focus on and consider is making sure that we have the right environment for private investment as well. I think that there can sometimes be a risk that we talk about green energy or a flourishing economy. I think that those two things are not mutually exclusive. We all appreciate and, I'm sure, support the fact that green energy is an opportunity for us to grow our economy here in Wales. The Government certainly has a significant role, not just in terms of that investment of energy firms, but creating that environmental infrastructure, which is an issue that I raised last week here in the Chamber, to enable and encourage that private investment.

The third point, which has been laboured on perhaps more this afternoon than any other, is the importance of working across nations in the United Kingdom. The climate and nature emergency that we are facing is not a Wales-only concern, and is not therefore a Wales-only solution. We must continue to seek to work together, and there may be times when it's difficult, I would acknowledge that—I'm not going to ignore that—but it doesn't mean that we have to stop that, and there must be ways that we can continue to build on those relationships and those efforts where they are working well.

So, I tried to be as brief as possible there, Deputy Presiding Officer: three points that, hopefully, are practical and hopefully will help us to see the delivery of this really important work that's ahead of us.

It was back in 2019 that this Senedd became the first Parliament to declare a climate emergency and, a few months ago, the first Parliament to declare a nature emergency. We know that the task ahead is monumental, and that it requires serious thinking and the will to change the system that we live in. I have always been clear: the current economic system that we live under is incompatible with dealing with the climate and nature emergency, as is the truth of any system that puts profit and greed above all else.

The shift to a net-zero economy, for example, will be one of the most profound economic transformations that we have seen in decades, and a pivotal moment in the history of not just Wales, but humanity. It calls on us to put community and planet first. We are the ones, right here, right now, who will decide whether or not this planet is habitable for our grandchildren. We are living in one of those points, as Delyth Jewell said, in history where humanity succeeds or fails.

As we shift to a net-zero economy, the consequences for our communities will be far reaching. Yes, decarbonisation offers us some potentially rich rewards, but we must ensure that everyone benefits from those rewards. Members will hopefully be aware of the principle of just transition. This principle must be key to any strategy to tackle climate change. It means moving our economy to a more sustainable one, in a way that's fair for all workers, no matter what industry they work in.

The way that our economy is set up now means that many people's livelihoods and wider communities are tied to the polluting industries: industries that are going to drastically change; industries that will shrink; and industries that will potentially disappear entirely, which will ultimately change the lives of workers in the communities for generations to come. We have seen the impact of an unjust transition already. When Thatcher closed the pits, communities were left out to dry, and the effects are still being dealt with today.

The Welsh Government must explore the opportunities to establish a renewable energy centre of excellence to address the current skills gap, whether that is through training people anew or retraining those in high-carbon sectors. This can only be delivered on a national strategic scale. I'd like to ask the Welsh Government to outline their response honestly, if they believe that the workforce as it currently exists can deliver on their green commitments. Can the workforce actually deliver green housing commitments? Can it deliver energy insulation goals? Can it deliver for nature?

I would like to thank Plaid Cymru for tabling this debate this afternoon on a very important and pertinent issue. Apart from a few on the fringes of society, there is no-one on this planet who can deny the calamities facing us, from the changing climate that threatens regular, extreme weather events, like the flooding that devastated my constituency at the start of this year, to the massive decline in nature, which has seen the loss of countless species. How we act over the next few decades will determine the viability of life on earth.

However, we have to ensure that we not only do the right thing, but we do it in the right way. We all remember the disastrous policies of the Blair/Brown era that promoted diesel engines in a misguided attempt to control carbon emissions. We are still dealing with the fall-out from that fiasco today. How many children died or suffered long-term health effects from the rise in particulates and nitrogen oxides? We have to ensure that what we do today doesn’t have unintended consequences, otherwise we will have failed to learn from the lessons of the past.

The industrial revolution led to massive benefits for mankind, but also led to untold damage to the only place humans can call home: planet earth. We cannot continue to make the same mistakes. Even on a micro level, we must ensure that the actions we take to limit damage to our climate and nature do not cause unnecessary damage to lives and livelihoods. The 10 largest global corporations are responsible for 70 per cent of emissions, but it won’t be their bank balances that suffer as we tackle climate change; it will be the poorest in society who will share the heaviest burden.

While there is no alternative to net zero, getting there will have an astronomical price tag. It will ensure an increased cost for basic necessities, such as food and fuel. We are seeing those effects now. My constituents, some of the poorest in the western world, could be hit the hardest. How will a retired couple in Rhyl afford to pay for retrofitting a replacement to their gas heating? Because we lacked the foresight, we have failed to invest in the technology that will address these issues. Our research and development spend is woeful, and that is why a Welshman had to travel to America to develop electric vehicles. Hopefully, the Welsh Government can persuade the chief executive officer of Lucid Motors to come back to Wales, and I can highly recommend St Asaph business park.

Everything Welsh Government does should not only be focused on tackling our environmental woes, but also to consider the wider implications. By not rebuilding Llanerch bridge in my constituency sooner, we are adding to the congestion and pollution, as well as denying local residents access to active travel. By asking councils to pursue a rewilding policy, you fail to consider the consequences of turning a green space, used for exercise and play, into a wildflower meadow. It’s great for bees, but not so great for boys and girls. Every policy has a place, but Welsh Government must ensure a holistic approach, and we must avoid unintended consequences. Diolch yn fawr.

Our communities are important to all Members of Plaid Cymru across Wales, but they're particularly important to me because they're part of my portfolio. So, I'd like to focus my contribution to this debate on the generation of community energy, and we've heard about that in the previous debate.

It's possible these projects could only be a small part of the energy system in future, but they are a vital part, because they will play a key role in gaining permission, increasing engagement and incorporating the kind of radical behaviour change that we will need to avoid the worst effects of the climate crisis. Communities have to be at the heart of any green change. Every community has its role to play. As Community Energy Wales said, there is increased interest from town and community councils that want to provide energy projects to get to grips with the climate crisis. The grass-roots projects are, by their nature, democratic in their structure, and this means that they promote democratic engagement. And we know that we have a deficiency in this regard in Wales. We will need to have that citizenship engagement to reach zero carbon, so we need to ask the Government to provide that guidance in the sector.

In order to unlock the potential of community energy on a wide scale, we need a long-term policy environment that is stable and supported by the Welsh Government and the UK Government. It's difficult to overstate the importance of community energy to drive that behaviour change. During the coming years, decarbonising the economy will call for significant change for consumers, such as changing to heat pumps and retrofitting our housing stock, which is often poorly insulated. Community energy organisations are acknowledged and trusted in their local areas for their community benefits, so they're vital in generating that public support and that contribution to transition to new energy sources.

To wrap up, I'd like to outline some of the steps the sector has been asking Welsh Government to take, and I'd certainly appreciate a response from the Minister—[Interruption.] Yes, certainly.

I think your point about community energy led by community councils is really important, but I wonder why you think that community and town councils haven't seized on this a lot sooner. Because all the community energy projects I can think of in Wales have all been developed by other people, whether with the assistance of the National Trust or whether by persistent individuals who've stuck to it despite all the planning obstacles put in their way. Why have town and community councils, a lot of whom have quite considerable resources, not been actively reinvesting in the community energy that could enrich their communities?

Thank you very much for the intervention. I think it's the lack of frameworks and help to encourage them to get involved in that side of things.

The sector has asked for access to necessary support, resources and finance. Furthermore, they've asked for further abilities for generators to sell their energy locally, whether this is through procurement requirements on public bodies or improved grid capacity. Assets are another core area for consideration, as well as access to land and buildings for development, and the sector wants to see the Welsh Government facilitate and support further democratic control over such assets. They also want further democratic control over the process, such as developing decarbonisation plans and approaches to research and discussions through citizen assemblies, putting communities at the heart of the green recovery.

What this really comes down to is one of our central arguments: democratic control of our own resources. Whether it's the Crown Estate or local energy production, it's Wales, our people, our communities and our democratically elected authorities who should control our resources and, ultimately, realise the benefits. Our energy generation and the profits that flow from it should not be in the hands of large foreign multinationals or, indeed, our neighbours across the border. Diolch yn fawr.

I call on the Minister for Climate Change, Julie James.

Diolch, Dirprwy Lywydd. I very much welcome the opportunity to respond to this debate. The motion from Plaid Cymru makes a number of very important points and recognises the steps we have taken to identify and tackle both the climate and the nature crisis. The climate and nature emergency is clearly not the next global crisis, it is the one already upon us. And I am very proud that, as a Senedd, we have taken collective action to declare these emergencies, and for committing Wales to a net-zero target for 2050. And let me just reiterate the point I've made previously: this is not the Welsh Government's target, as the motion sets out, it is our collective target for Wales—our target for people, businesses and organisations from right across our country. It's a target that requires us all to take action. Delyth and others set out the scale and severity of the challenge and its impact on human beings and our communities, but this very much needs not to be a counsel of despair. We can grasp the chance to change it, and we really need to do so. The 2020s need to be the decisive decade of action, not just in Wales, but globally. COP26 is a milestone moment that must deliver the step change that is needed.

The Government is also very supportive of much of the sentiment of the second part of the motion. We agree the distribution of powers and responsibilities across the UK is in need of a fundamental change. That is why we have announced our intention to establish an independent commission on the constitutional future of Wales. But what we need is a comprehensive assessment of the powers Wales needs in a fundamentally different constitutional settlement. This includes, but is very much not limited to, our responsibilities in energy and in management of the Crown Estate in Wales. And I think it's very telling that Janet Finch-Saunders seems completely oblivious to the fact that the grid is not devolved—would that it were—and her utter confusion on that is indicative of the real nature of the need to make these much more clear. Because, unfortunately, what we have seen from the Conservative Government in London is a deep hostility to devolution. As they celebrate very small investments in Wales, similar to the list in the motion from Darren Millar, the UK Government also systemically undermines the responsibilities that the people of Wales have granted this Senedd.

We welcome investment into Wales, but we want to work with the UK Government and continue our partnership working with local government and wider social partners in Wales. However, the UK Government is, unfortunately, pushing an agenda that deliberately cuts out the Government in Wales, which has had the responsibility to deliver for Wales over the last three decades. The way the UK Government has proceeded on funding for fisheries is a direct attack on devolution, and has caused confusion, and will continue to create unnecessary ill will amongst stakeholders. The Government will not be supporting the amendment from Darren Millar. The Government's amendment shares the sentiment of the original motion, and I call on all Members to support it.

As we look forward to COP26, it is very important that we do not forget the action that has already been taken at previous UN climate change conferences of the parties, including COP24. We have been clear that, as we move to a greater share of our energy coming from renewable sources, this transition must be a just one. We heard something of the last transition, which was not a just one, and we are very determined that this one will be not be thus. Our programme for government underlines the importance of social justice and a transition to net zero that leaves no-one behind and no place behind. The Silesia declaration at COP24 captured the need to support workers as part of this move to net zero. We remain committed to the spirit of that declaration, reflecting its essence in our social partnership Bill and our working methodologies.

I call on Llyr Gruffydd to reply to the debate.

Thank you very much, Deputy Presiding Officer, and thank you to everyone who's contributed to the debate. It's been a broad-ranging debate, and I think that reflects the breadth of the original motion, but also the amendments tabled to it. Many people have reminded us that we are facing crises in nature and climate, and they are interrelated, and it stands to reason therefore that the solutions are interrelated, and COP26 and COP15 are two parts of the same jigsaw when it comes to solving the crisis that we face. Action to date has not been adequate. I think the Government and everyone else would acknowledge that, because there is always more that we could do and should do, and would wish to do, in tackling these challenges.

One area hasn't been touched upon, and I think it would be remiss of me not to refer to it. I, the Minister and others attended the launch this morning of a report by WWF Cymru, RSPB Cymru and Size of Wales that really drives home, I think, how tackling our domestic footprint in terms of carbon emissions and loss of biodiversity is only part of the problem. I think it's remiss that we hadn't included the global element in our motion, nor in any of the amendments as well.

Wales has a very significant overseas land footprint—quite startling figures revealed in that report today. It really does hold a mirror up, as I was saying earlier, to us as politicians and to society more widely in terms of the impact that we're having beyond our borders. An area equivalent of 40 per cent of the size of Wales was required overseas to grow imports of certain produce that we use here in Wales, 30 per cent of the land used to grow Welsh imports of commodities in some of those countries are categorised as high or very high risk for social and deforestation issues, and the greenhouse gas emissions associated with that activity represents 4 per cent of Wales's total estimated domestic and imported goods carbon footprint, or the equivalent of nearly a quarter of all the emissions of transport in Wales. It's startling, it's striking, it's shameful, really, and each and every one of us, regrettably, are contributing to that. It's important that when Delyth Jewell, in opening the debate, was talking about the need for clarity around the parity that we need to give in relation to climate and nature emergencies—I think it's also now time for that parity to be reflected in relation to our domestic and our global responsibilities, particularly within the context of the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015, where being a globally responsible country is a responsibility for each and every one of us as Welsh citizens.

I'll just respond to a few of the contributions. Janet Finch-Saunders was lauding the apparent green revolution, I think was the term that you used, that's coming our way from the Westminster Government. Well, you're certainly doing your bit for Tory greenwashing there. You didn't mention the Cambo oil field or new coal mines in the north of England or, indeed, as you were reminded by some Members, the lack of support for tidal lagoons in Wales, or even the UK Government's seeming insistence on forcing more cars on more Welsh roads, particularly around Newport. So, don't come here and talk the talk when the UK Government isn't walking the walk. I think it's regrettable that you struck that tone. And similarly Gareth Davies blaming Blair and Brown for where we are today. In fairness, it's not as if we've had a Tory Government for 10 years since then, but I'm sure you'll get around to it at some point. Let's hope you get around to it by the time we get to the COP26 negotiations. Because, as the Minister said, it's a milestone moment, really, isn't it, and we mustn't miss the opportunity. My fear is that the UK Government has failed to build an international coalition around the need to really get to grips with this before we get to COP26, but obviously the jury's out and we'll have to see what is achieved. And many of us I know will be attending and hopefully doing our own little bit as much as we can to try to achieve the outcome that we want to achieve.

The proposal is to agree the motion without amendment. Does any Member object? [Objection.] I see that there is objection, so I will defer voting on this motion until voting time, which follows.

In accordance with Standing Order 12.18, I will suspend the meeting before proceeding to voting time.

Everybody who wants to vote is available. Okay, we now reach voting time, and I'll speak in English to make sure I don't get it wrong. We now vote on the Plaid Cymru debate, the energy sector and the climate and nature emergencies. I call for a vote on the motion tabled in the name of Siân Gwenllian. If the proposal is not agreed, we will vote on the amendments tabled to the motion. Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 14, no abstentions, 42 against, therefore the motion is not agreed.

We therefore move to a vote on the amendments. A vote on amendment 1 first. If amendment 1 is agreed, amendment 2 will be deselected. I therefore call for a vote on amendment 1 tabled in the name of Darren Millar. Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 15, no abstentions, 41 against, therefore amendment 1 is not agreed.

We now move to amendment 2, and I call for a vote on amendment 2, tabled in the name of Lesley Griffiths. Open the vote. Close the vote. In favour 43, no abstentions, 13 against, therefore amendment 2 is agreed.

I now call for a vote on the motion as amended.

Open the vote. Close the vote. Can I confirm that that vote has also got Julie, because I seem to be one down? Okay. There we are. In favour 56, no abstentions, none against, therefore the motion as amended is agreed. Thank you. And that closes the voting for today.

We now move to the short debate.

I call on Alun Davies to speak to the topic he has chosen.

If you are leaving the Chamber, please do so quietly.

Diolch yn fawr, Dirprwy Lywydd, and I'm grateful to you for allowing this short debate. Tom Giffard has asked for a minute of my time this afternoon, so I will ensure that I conclude my remarks in time for him to be able to speak.

Levelling up is one of those things in politics that we'd never heard of a few years ago, and now we never hear the end of today. One of the many parts of the UK Government's levelling-up process is something that is constantly discussed, but never defined. And I think for many of us—. I find myself in the unhappy situation possibly today of having been around for long enough to remember these things turning up on more than one occasion. And one of the things that I find most disappointing about the United Kingdom Government's approach to its overall levelling-up agenda is that it doesn't define any targets, it doesn't define any objectives and it doesn't allow any accountability. I was lucky enough to be a European programmes Minister in the Welsh Government between 2011 and 2013, and that period covered the renegotiation of the EU budget at that time. It also covered the new legislation on structural funds.

The Welsh Government and the people of Wales were involved in that process. They were involved in that process because it was done in public, it was done with accountability and democracy and scrutiny and transparency. The legislation was passed in public. The budget was debated in public. The Welsh Government were involved in defining the United Kingdom's position on all of those matters. There were secondments between the Welsh Government and the UK Government to enable the expertise of the Welsh Government to be used to its best ability to inform what the UK Government's position was at that time. I attended European Councils and we debated those matters in this Chamber on a number of occasions.

All of those different aspects underpinned a policy approach. None of those things are true today about a levelling-up agenda—none of those things are true today. There's no transparency. We don't know what the objectives are of the United Kingdom Government. They haven't published any targets, they haven't published a timescale, they've missed every consultation that they've promised, and there's been no accountability of any description at all. It is a lesson in how not to make policy and how not to involve people. And I say that as an introduction because it is important that we don't only make those points in relation to the United Kingdom Government, but we ensure that the Welsh Government doesn't repeat those errors and those mistakes as well. It is always important to learn from history rather than to repeat the mistakes of history.

And in my time here, I've seen a number of different initiatives launched for our own levelling-up agenda in the Valleys of south Wales. I remember the One Wales Government, where Leighton Andrews and then Jocelyn Davies worked exceptionally hard, both Ministers, in order to deliver agendas for the Heads of the Valleys and for the Valleys as a whole. I then remember the work that was done in order to deliver other programmes in the Government elected in 2011, and, as many Members will remember, I was appointed by Carwyn Jones to lead the Valleys taskforce, which was appointed to lead this work after the 2016 election. And as I look back over that period of time, I'm thinking of the lessons that we should be learning, as a Welsh Government and as a Parliament. And what are those lessons?

There's a lesson in consistency of personnel, of Ministers. There have been too many Ministers involved over too short a period of time, and I hope that the Minister that is in his place this afternoon will be in his place for many afternoons and will be able to drive forward a policy agenda that has consistency over time. The irony is, considering the debate that we've just had on climate, that the only consistency of policy that has been delivered in the Valleys has been the dualling of the A465. It's the only consistent policy that has been pursued over the last decade, and difficulties have been involved, but it's been pursued by Ministers and successive Ministers have ensured that the policy has been and is being delivered. But we have not had a consistency of policy, and we have not had a consistency of approach, and we have not had a consistency of personnel, and that has weakened our ability to deliver for the Valleys.

We have not also ensured that we've had the ambitions and timescales and targets agreed at all times, and we have not always—and this is the key point I would like to make in my comments this afternoon—had sufficient focus on delivery. I well remember the conversation I had with Carwyn Jones when he was appointing me to lead the Valleys taskforce. He said, 'I want you to lead the Valleys taskforce.' There was no smoke and mirrors there. He said, 'You've no budget and no department; I want you to bring people together in order to deliver for the Valleys of south Wales.' I didn't have a budget in order to rent a meeting space or to provide tea or coffee. What we had to do was to persuade Ministers—and the Minister himself will recognise how difficult this can be—to essentially lend me officials, to lend me budgets and to lend me a political commitment. And that was one of the most difficult things you can ask anybody to do in Government, because officials—. There's a lot of nonsense talked about the civil service. The civil service is a fantastic machine and has very many talented people, but it works in a hierarchical fashion; it works towards a Minister. And when you're asking an official to work to another Minister it doesn't work, and we found it very, very difficult.

But we set out our ambitions and I was very clear, and this followed the vote on Brexit—and I think the vote on Brexit in the Valleys of south Wales had far more to do with this place than it had to do with Brussels; it had far more to do with failures here and in London than it had to do with failures in Brussels, so I think we need to recognise that. And one of the things that I wanted to do was to ensure that we did have a level of accountability, and Members here will remember that I came to this Chamber and set out targets, set out objectives, set out timescales that we would meet over that four- or five-year period. I'm disappointed that the previous Government didn't report on those matters. They should have done so. We gave our word to the people in these communities that we would deliver these things over the period of five years. We haven't reported on what we have done, and we need to be able to do that.

Thank you, Alun, for bringing this debate to the Chamber today. I think it's a very important debate and I'm really grateful to you for giving me some time to speak.

One of the key lessons that I drew from your remarks was that you are right to say, 'Okay, levelling up is a new political buzzword,' if you like, but it is not just the responsibility of the UK Government. The UK Government absolutely has to play a role, but I think that all levels of government, and the private sector as well, have a role to play.

To that end, I wanted to use my remarks today to specifically hone in on my experience as a local councillor in Bridgend, and specifically the application of the LDP process and how that is failing its Valleys communities. Because, in my mind, that is a case study in and of itself. So, to that end, I will first declare my interest in this matter as a current councillor at Bridgend County Borough Council.

I see that the Member for Ogmore is here, and so I won’t need to explain the geography of Bridgend. But, for those who don't know, you have got your three main valleys in the north of the constituency—the Ogmore, Llynfi and Garw valleys—and your larger towns in the south. But, unfortunately, looking at that planning process, and the LDP process in Bridgend, it shows through a prism of a real tale of two halves.

I will give you an example: in Bridgend council's 2018-33 LDP, just 14 per cent of the homes planned to be built are in those Valleys areas, or the Valleys gateway area. Or, to put it another way, just 1,360 of the 9,200 homes planned are situated in those communities. The question that we need to ask ourselves is, 'Why?' Why is our LDP process in Bridgend—and presumably elsewhere—failing our Valleys communities?

There are, of course, some places in Bridgend with significant brownfield land that could be built on in these Valleys communities. I have had these discussions with officers and, in the past, they have told me that these areas just aren't as attractive to developers. But, surely, that's the tail wagging the dog. We need to ensure that houses are being built where they will do the most public good— [Interruption.]—rather than just flood other communities because they are more attractive. [Interruption.]

[Inaudible.]—so far.

I apologise. I will wrap up soon. Our planning policies should benefit our communities, not our developers. One of Bridgend council's own reports says:

'transport capacity issues currently preclude additional significant development within this area at present'.

Because we are not investing in the Valleys communities, they are considered less attractive to live in. But then, we are not fixing that additional housing because of the lack of transport capacity. It's a vicious cycle.

If we are going to level up the Valleys, we can't allow this to continue. We need a planning system that works for all of our communities and, yes, make them more attractive to live in by further investment from all tiers of Government, and encouraging local authorities not only to take the easy option when it comes to meeting housing targets, but the ones with the biggest long-term benefit to our communities too.

I call on the Minister for Economy to reply to the debate. Vaughan Gething.

Thank you, Deputy Presiding Officer. Can I begin by thanking Alun Davies for bringing forward this debate today? It's a genuinely interesting and timely discussion in a number of ways. I want to thank both Members for their thoughtful contributions. Most of my remarks will be about the Heads of the Valleys area, of course, because of where Alun Davies is from, as he regularly reminds us, and it has been a pleasure to hear him talk about the long history, both when I've been in Blaenau Gwent, as well as down here.

But, I would say to Tom Giffard and his contribution, if we are genuinely going to look to have a system where we can deliberately direct investment towards less advantaged areas, then there are real challenges in the approach that is coming, not just from levelling up, but on subsidy control and the Subsidy Control Bill going through the UK Parliament, which the Members here will want to take an interest in. Because if that does proceed on the current basis, it makes it much, much harder to invest in those less advantaged areas. Far from seeing a process where it is easier and more attractive to invest in those least well-off areas, we will find it even more difficult to do so. It's part of the challenge that we see, which Alun Davies referred to, about the broad label of 'levelling up' that no-one is going to disagree with, in essence, and yet the reality of the policy choices that are being made. I will come later on to a bit more about levelling up.

The reality is that much of the work that we have done in supporting the Heads of the Valleys, in particular, has been possible as a result of the work of the Welsh Government and partners in the third sector, higher education, the private sector and, of course, the voluntary sector, to deliver European structural funds. It has made a real difference. To put that in context, current EU funding programmes have helped to create 3,600 jobs and supported more than 2,000 businesses and helped almost 9,000 people into work, just in the Heads of the Valleys area.

It is because of this success that we have spent considerable time designing, with key Welsh partners, a framework for investment based on evidence and agreement, with clear priorities for Wales. This is what a Team Wales approach looks like, and we're looking to build on that and the work we're doing now, together with work that the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development are doing, so there's an honest broker to look at the international evidence of how we can have a successful approach to regional economic development.

During my statement last month on UK plans for replacement EU funding and the broad levelling-up agenda, I shared not just my concerns, but those of other devolved national Governments in the UK, parliaments, committees and leading experts. It still remains the case that the UK Government approach to date is incoherent, chaotic, has no considerable or coherent economic rationale, and the current approach lacks agreement or insight. If it continues on this journey, it will fail to deliver the outcomes that our communities deserve. And I don’t just mean here for Wales either because the truth is that’s not just my view that people will be familiar with, but if you were to have this conversation with local government, the higher education sector, or the third sector in Scotland or England as well as here in Wales, there would be a broadly similar view. The challenge is to get through that confusion and get to a framework that really could deliver the sort of benefits that all Governments of different shades across the UK could sign up to and agree.

My predecessor and I have requested meetings with UK Ministers leading on this area to discuss those concerns and to want to reach agreement for a better way forward. The meetings are well overdue, given it’s been over 18 months since Brexit. We know that, sadly, the community renewal fund and the levelling-up fund have not seen a single decision made from the pilots that have been announced. Not a single determination on those pilots. We’re at the point where local authorities right across the UK won’t be able to spend that money successfully within this calendar year, and that’s a real challenge. We’re losing a year of time and money and, actually, the way things are, we’ll lose more time into the next year, because I think it’ll be very challenging for any Government to deliver a proper framework that will be ready and available for implementation within the next year.

So, we do now expect that we might have a high-level policy framework for the shared prosperity fund to be announced at the spending review later this month. And I say again that I hope that the new Secretary of State, Michael Gove, will take a different approach from his predecessors, and generally work with us to deliver UK-wide funds that will deliver better value for money, better outcomes, and won’t put at risk the delivery of national schemes like Business Wales, apprenticeships and the development bank. The current approach also puts at risk that vital funding for a wide range of other partners, not just local government, which are essential for the growth in our communities, but as I said, the third sector, business, and higher and further education too.

But we are clear in our ambition for an economic recovery that builds a fairer, greener and more prosperous Wales. And the Member was right to highlight the investment in the Tech Valleys programme, which is a part of that vision, and it is gaining traction; it's seeing more results. I was recently at the Thales facility, and others, and the Member noticed that I was there. I was very pleased to have his endorsement of my visit to his constituency. But to see what then happens to build on that, not just for the one project, but for the opportunities for other businesses, and the point the Member makes about having hubs to draw people together in activity.

And in the same leaf, the First Minister also met with representatives from CiNER Glass Limited, who are looking to create a significant employment opportunity, again within Blaenau Gwent. And it's true, of course, they'll be physically based in Blaenau Gwent, but the travel-to-work area means there'll be people from outside the county borough, and the Member's constituency, who we would expect to be employed there. Now, that will not only bring the jobs to the area, it will look to use technology to help meet the Welsh Government's own climate change targets and will also be an investment in the circular economy.

On Monday this week I met with chief executives and political leaders from the five local authorities who make up the Heads of the Valleys area to discuss our shared ambition and how we together translate those into joint priorities for action. And the meeting was a positive one; it hasn't always been the case. If you think about 10 years ago, getting five local authorities and the Government in the same room together to agree on a project, and to agree that we are going to use our respective levers to do something positive—and again, that doesn't mean to say those conversations never happened, but I think we are now in a better place to see that translate into reality, which is the main point the Member makes: not just objectives, but then, will we deliver on the outcomes that we look to set ourselves as well?

So, this is about also seizing the opportunity to re-energise and redesign many of our town centres and high streets across the Valleys, and the good news is that whilst we recognise there's a lot to challenge, there are also opportunities of where that's already been done successfully. There are opportunities to learn from what has already worked. And we recognise town centres as an intersection in human life and activity, and the need to secure long-term sustainability and the importance of a sense of place for where people live in having a thriving town centre or high street.

Thank you, Minister. That brings today's proceedings to a close. Thank you, all.