, Plenary
Group 7: Intervention in Agricultural Markets—Input Costs (Amendments 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62)
Amendment 58—is it being moved?
, Plenary
Group 7: Intervention in Agricultural Markets—Input Costs (Amendments 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62)
Yes it is. The question is that amendment 57 be agreed to. Does any Member object? [Objection.] Yes, there is objection. Therefore, we will proceed to a vote on amendment 57. Open the vote. Close the vote. The vote is tied, therefore I use my casting vote…
, Plenary
Group 7: Intervention in Agricultural Markets—Input Costs (Amendments 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62)
Amendment 57—is that being moved, Samuel Kurtz?
, Plenary
Group 7: Intervention in Agricultural Markets—Input Costs (Amendments 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62)
The question is that amendment 56 be agreed to. Does any Member object? [Objection.] Yes, there is objection. Therefore, we will proceed to a vote on amendment 56. Open the vote. Close the vote. The vote is tied, therefore, I use my casting vote against…
, Plenary
Group 7: Intervention in Agricultural Markets—Input Costs (Amendments 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62)
Samuel Kurtz to reply to the debate.
, Plenary
Group 7: Intervention in Agricultural Markets—Input Costs (Amendments 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62)
The Minister.
, Plenary
Group 7: Intervention in Agricultural Markets—Input Costs (Amendments 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62)
Group 7 is the next group of amendments, and this group relates to intervention in agricultural markets and input costs. The lead amendment in this group is amendment 56, and I call on Samuel Kurtz to move and speak to the lead amendment and the other…
, Plenary
Group 6: Multi-annual Support Plans (Amendment 42)
The question is that amendment 42 be agreed to. Does any Member object? No, there is no objection. Therefore, amendment 42 is agreed.
, Plenary
Group 6: Multi-annual Support Plans (Amendment 42)
Mabon ap Gwynfor to reply.
, Plenary
Group 6: Multi-annual Support Plans (Amendment 42)
The Minister.
, Plenary
Group 6: Multi-annual Support Plans (Amendment 42)
Group 6 is the next group of amendments. This group relates to multi-annual support plans. The lead and only amendment in this group is amendment 42, and I call on Mabon ap Gwynfor to move amendment 42. Mabon ap Gwynfor.
, Plenary
Group 5: Sustainable Land Management Reporting (Amendments 40, 41)
It's being moved by Samuel Kurtz. Is there any objection to amendment 55? [Objection.] Yes, there is objection. Therefore, we will open the vote on amendment 55. Close the vote. In favour 27, no abstentions, 25 against. And therefore amendment 55 is agreed.
, Plenary
Group 5: Sustainable Land Management Reporting (Amendments 40, 41)
Amendment 55 is next in the name of Samuel Kurtz.
, Plenary
Group 5: Sustainable Land Management Reporting (Amendments 40, 41)
Yes, it is. Is there any objection to amendment 38? No. Therefore, amendment 38 is agreed.
, Plenary
Group 5: Sustainable Land Management Reporting (Amendments 40, 41)
Amendment 38 is next. Is it being moved by Jane Dodds?
, Plenary
Group 5: Sustainable Land Management Reporting (Amendments 40, 41)
The question is that amendment 54 be agreed to. Does any Member object? [Objection.] Yes, there is an objection. Therefore, we will open the vote on amendment 54. Close the vote. There are 26 in favour, 26 against, therefore the vote is tied. I use my casting…
, Plenary
Group 5: Sustainable Land Management Reporting (Amendments 40, 41)
Amendment 54 is being moved by Samuel Kurtz.
, Plenary
Group 5: Sustainable Land Management Reporting (Amendments 40, 41)
Yes, it is being moved by Samuel Kurtz. Is there any objection to amendment 53? [Objection.] Yes, there is objection. Therefore, we will proceed to a vote on amendment 53. Open the vote. Close the vote. There are 26 in favour, 26 against, no abstentions. I…
, Plenary
Group 5: Sustainable Land Management Reporting (Amendments 40, 41)
The next vote is on amendment 53. Is that being moved?
, Plenary
Group 5: Sustainable Land Management Reporting (Amendments 40, 41)
Yes, it is. The question is that amendment 52 be agreed to. Does any Member object? [Objection.] Yes, there is objection. Therefore, we will proceed to a vote on amendment 52. Open the vote. Close the vote. There are 26 in favour, no abstentions, 26 against…
, Plenary
Group 5: Sustainable Land Management Reporting (Amendments 40, 41)
Amendment 52. Is that being moved, Samuel Kurtz?
, Plenary
Group 5: Sustainable Land Management Reporting (Amendments 40, 41)
Yes, it is. The question is that amendment 41 be agreed to. Does any Member object? No. Therefore, amendment 41 is agreed as well.
, Plenary
Group 5: Sustainable Land Management Reporting (Amendments 40, 41)
The next question is about amendment 41. Is it being moved by Mabon ap Gwynfor?
, Plenary
Group 5: Sustainable Land Management Reporting (Amendments 40, 41)
The question is that amendment 40 be agreed to. Does any Member object? No. So, amendment 40 is agreed.
, Plenary
Group 5: Sustainable Land Management Reporting (Amendments 40, 41)
Mabon ap Gwynfor to reply.
